The National Assembly has turned down Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan’s request for reinstatement, maintaining that the recent Federal High Court judgement did not issue a binding directive but merely offered an advisory opinion.
In a letter dated July 14, 2025, addressed to her legal counsel, Michael Jonathan Numa (SAN), the federal legislature clarified that the court’s decision, delivered on July 4, did not compel the Senate or its leadership to act. The letter was signed by Charles Yoila, Director of Litigation and Counselling, on behalf of the Clerk to the National Assembly.
The legislature cited the case marked FHC/ABJ/CS/384/2025, stating, “From our summary of the judgement order, there is no order made on the 4th day of July, 2025 by Hon. Justice B.F.N. Nyako for the Senate, President of the Senate or National Assembly to comply with.”
Akpoti-Uduaghan’s legal team had sought her immediate recall, referencing the judgement as a green light for her return to the Red Chamber following her suspension. However, the National Assembly’s interpretation dismisses the ruling as non-binding.
The response has sparked backlash from civil society organisations and democracy advocates, who argue that the prolonged suspension of an elected lawmaker constitutes legislative overreach and threatens democratic norms.
A source close to Akpoti-Uduaghan described the reply as “disappointing but not unexpected,” adding that her legal team is now exploring further options, including a possible appeal or contempt proceedings.
Since the court ruling, Akpoti-Uduaghan has made repeated efforts to return to plenary through formal legal channels. While she has kept a low public profile, she issued a brief statement on July 5 thanking supporters and reaffirming her dedication to represent Kogi Central.
The final decision now lies with the Senate’s leadership. Senate President Godswill Akpabio has yet to issue a public comment, though sources indicate internal disagreement within the chamber.
As pressure mounts from constituents and rights groups, and with potential legal escalation on the horizon, the standoff is quickly becoming a test case for the strength of legislative independence and constitutional rule in Nigeria.
