…Their generation should quit
Nobel laureate, Prof. Wole Soyinka, has said his counsel to both the presidential candidates of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC), Atiku Abubakar and the President-elect, Asiwaju Bola Tinubu, respectively, when he was consulted was that they should leave the stage for fresh energies to pilot the affairs of Nigeria.
Soyinka while speaking in an interview with Arise TV, Wednesday, said he had counselled them that what the Country needed was an infusion of fresh blood into the system.
He said he had charged them to, rather than contesting themselves, channel their energies to support the emergence of a young brilliant candidate, which he said would serve the Country better.
Soyinka who said it was time the generation of the duo retire from the stage, said they chose to contest for reasons best known to them.
He said, “I told Atiku when he was contesting and came to see me in my Ikeja Office few years ago; he came with Gbenga Daniel, former Governor of Ogun state.
“I said to him, ‘Listen, it’s about time you people left the stage, why don’t you just go away. We need an infusion of fresh blood into the system.’
“But, for some people, maybe they read it as bloodletting. No, I said infusion of fresh blood. I said so I cannot support you. I think your generation should quit.
“But, he wasn’t the only one. I then sought out the current President-elect, Tinubu and I gave him exactly the same message.
“I said, ‘Whatever you people are planning, I’m convinced that we need the young generation, new thinking, new sensibilities, new energies.’
“So, why don’t you just leave the stage, let’s look for somebody, a really brilliant individual then use your entire influence to catapult that person to power, and this country will see a massive transformation.
“We spoke for about an hour and a half, and then Bola Tinubu said, ‘No.’ He said there were still things he felt he could still contribute,” Soyinka said.
The Nobel laureate had earlier said he also warned the presidential candidate of the Labour Party (LP), Peter Obi on the excesses of the his supporters, otherwise known as ‘Obidients.’
Soyinka gave the call to order in a statement titled, “Media responsibility” on Tuesday
Soyinka, however, said his recent interview with Channels Television was misrepresented, with his remarks rendered unrecognisable.
The TV station had aired a one and half-hour interview with Soyinka a week ago on Monday.
Soyinka maintained that his rejection of fascism wasn’t new and that on three occasions, he was able to send a message to Obi, that, if he lost the election, it would be his followers who lost it for him.
“What I have read – at least, thus far – this morning, extracted from a one-and-a-half long interview, conducted a week ago with Channels Television, brings once more to the fore, the critical responsibility of the media in transmitting the spoken, even recorded – word to the public.
“This is especially crucial in a time of civic uncertainty. When remarks are taken out of context, spliced into a new one, provided a sensational headline, distortions become stamped on public receptivity, and the central intent of one’s remarks becomes completely unrecognisable.
“I denounced the menacing utterances of a vice-presidential aspirant as unbecoming. It was a gladiatorial challenge directed at the judiciary and, by implication, the rest of the democratic polity.
“But what on earth has happened to my even more urgent condemnation of the physical violence inflicted on those designated ‘strangers’ in Lagos in the lead up to, and during governorship elections?
“This prejudicial selectivity is a betrayal of trust, and I find it contemptuous of public deserving. My critique of incipient fascism in the movement remains grounded in indisputable evidence.”
Soyinka stated that throughout the interview, he continued to stress that the final word had yet to be pronounced on the elections – “that omission renders the full message tendentious!”
“My rejection of fascism is nothing new. It was depressing to watch his lieutenant, a crucially positioned voice of a movement that has ‘broken the mould,’ threaten the totality of social existence.
“Whatever our ideological leaning, is Donald Trump the ideal template for a burgeoning democracy in the nation?”
He stated that he also remained concerned about the alleged complaint by him of people not following “instructions.”
“If words are garbled in recording, the speaker can be reached for clarification – else, simply leave out the unclear section completely to avoid misrepresentation.
“After all, piecemeal transmission is legitimate proceeding, as long as a part is not presented as the whole.
“I am not a member of the Labour Party, so how can giving ‘instructions’ become my role?
“Like a number of others, I have admittedly contributed to the making of this moment – going back several years – and it is painful to have the followers of such a movement, send it slithering backwards and down the fascistic slope,” Soyinka said.