Connect with us

Opinion

Vox populi, vox dei?

Published

on

By Bolanle Bolawole

There is little that can withstand a man who can conquer himself.

Every time I appoint someone to a vacant position, I make a hundred unhappy and one ungrateful. I am the state” – France’s King Louis XIV.

France’s Bourbons king, Louis XIV (Born: 5 September, 1638; Died: 1 September, 1715), also known as Louis the Great or the Sun King, ascended to the throne in 1643 and reigned until his death in 1715. His reign of 72 years and 110 days is said to be the longest of any French sovereign (he began to reign at the age of five). The statement “L’etat, c’est moi” literally meaning, “the State, it is me” credited to this king demonstrated that he and the other Bourbons kings ruled with absolute power and iron hand and saw the French nation as their personal property with everything and everyone at their beck and call.

Which was why, despite that the objective conditions for the French revolution of 1789 had long been noticed, and Louis the Great was warned, he spurned the warnings. It will hold during my time, he was quoted as saying, let my successors take care of themselves! He was both right and wrong! Louis XV (Born: 15 February 1710; Died: 10 May, 1774; reigned from 1 September, 1715 until his death) took care of himself but not so his own successor, Louis XVI!

 Although called “Louis the beloved” Louis XV died an unpopular king; discontentment and the signs of a revolution were thick in the air throughout his reign. Regardless, this king and his wife, Marie, had 10 children in 10 years (1727 – 1737). He was reputed to have consummated his marriage to his wife seven times on their wedding night! Who was there doing the counting, if I may ask!

Fate, sometimes, is cruel even as Maximilien Robespierre (‘the Incorruptible’), who presided over France’s Reign of Terror (1793 – 1794), has said that “Pity is treason”! Louis XVI, who was minded to accept some of the reforms proposed by the leaders of the French revolution, was the one who got consumed by the revolution. He was guillotined on 21 January, 1793 “in the 39th year of his age, at 22 minutes after 10 o’clock in the forenoon.”

When situations have gotten so bad, any leader who appears on the scene must make up his mind which side of the divide he wants to pitch his tent – whether on the side of the people or against them. And if on the side of the people, he must act fast, and decisively, too. No sitting on the fence! No half measures! Drum this into Nigeria’s President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s ears!

 Another example that teaches this truth very clearly is Mikhail Gorbachev, the last effective leader of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republic. Gorbachev bid his time as he climbed up the ladder. Once in the saddle, he announced his twin-policy of “glasnost” and “perestroika” He wanted to make the Soviet society a little bit more open. He sought to give the people some liberty. But as he opened the door a little, a rush that he could not control swept him off his feet!

Revolutionary France will happen upon Nigeria if care is not taken! The objective conditions for a revolution are everywhere prevalent in Nigeria. Only the subjective conditions remain to be seen. And in the last few weeks we have seen food protests in Nigeria, which were similar to what happened in France when the peasants thronged the streets in their numbers chanting: “We are hungry, give us bread!”

On December 30 last year, Lagosians pelted Tinubu with cries of “Ebi n pa wa” We are hungry, they chanted as the president’s long motorcade waltz its way through the crowd in downtown Lagos. An arrogant Queen Marie-Antoinette had mocked the French peasants, saying: “Let them eat cake”! The starving people that could not afford cheap bread were the ones the queen teased with expensive cake!

Compare Marie-Antoinette’s obliviousness to the abject conditions and daily life of deprivation and penury of the French masses to the Nigerian Senate President, Godswill Akpabio’s insensitive and irresponsible “Let them breathe” response to the cry of Nigerians to their presumed representatives to take notice of the suffering in the land and act accordingly!

Ongoing food protests – were they spontaneous or sponsored? Even if they were sponsored, the prevailing conditions made that possible. No one can deny that the situation of things in the country has become unbearable, even for the middle class Nigerians, not to talk of the poor and the multidimensionally or desperately poor. If, on the other hand, the protests are spontaneous, then, it means Nigerians, ever so docile, are now stirring. And that is a warning signal for the government to act fast.

The mistake many are making is to think the problem is that of the president alone; it is not! State governors, local government chairpersons and the National Assembly members are all in the net together. There is no way an injury to the president will not affect these other fellows across the board. Even past presidents and governors; past National Assembly members, party leaders past and present should note how JJ Rawlings called some fellows out of retirement in Ghana to answer for their crime against the Fatherland. If Vox Populi is Vox Dei, then, let our leaders listen to the cries of the people and harken to the voice of God!

I see Tinubu in Gorbachev’s shoes. If he dithers, like the Soviet leader did, God help him! If he fiddles like king Nero did while Rome burned – like Gov. Babajide Sanwo-Olu of Lagos was reported partying in one fairytale island while fire was on his roof – you can be sure he will come to certain grief. Nigeria’s situation is dire; it is long past the one that half measures can take care off. “Either this or that” is what is needed now.

On whose side is Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu: On the people’s or their oppressors’? The same audacity that Tinubu displayed on the way to the presidency is needed now. He must call the same bulldozers into action. He has to step on toes now like he did then. Said Robespierre: “Audacity, more audacity and always audacity and France will be saved.” Yes, audacity, more audacity and unending audacity saved France. The same audacity is needed right now if Nigeria would be saved. Is Tinubu up to the task? Can this man rise above his well-known limitations and conquer his own foibles?

Let no one deceive you: This is no mean task. Says the great Greek philosopher, Aristotle: “I count him braver who overcomes his desires than him who conquers his enemies, for the hardest victory is over self” Tinubu conquered his many enemies on the way to receiving the APC presidential flag; he thereafter went ahead to defeat 17 opponents at the Saturday, February, 25, 2023 presidential election. Now, he is up against the fiercest enemy he will ever confront – his own self. Will he stumble at this hurdle? May he not! But should he, then…!

LAST WORD: Why have we not started growing food on a large scale all over the country – the Federal, state and local governments? Are housing estates our critical priority at this time? Are people protesting because they need accommodation or because they need food? In this respect, Tinubu’s administration has wasted eight months already! Why can’t the churches and mosques also clear hectares of land and pour their unemployed, hungry and angry members there?

FEEDBACK

God bless you for the write-up on the explosion at Ibadan that seems to focus on South-west governors and the way they have been playing politics with the welfare and development of the region! Your short reference to Miyetti is to tell our governors that they ought to come out of their hiding and boldly equip and mobilize our security operatives, the Amotekun, to become able to protect and rescue our people from predators who value cows more than human beings. If the South-west governors would rise up this time, perhaps, they should consider the call of the Aare Ona Kakanfo, Chief Gani Adams, seeking the inclusion of the Oodua People’s congress members (in Amotekun). The OPC have tried for us and as they are not tired, they should be incorporated (into Amotekun). One of the major duties of any government is security and protection of life and property but alas, people are no longer safe anywhere, to the extent that our Obas are now targets of kidnappers and unknown gunmen! Such was unheard-of in Yorubaland and it amounts to desecration of the land, which can trigger unrest if the authorities don’t act in time. According to you, our governors need to explain what they are doing with their security votes and we need to know why Lagos state has refused to join the South-west security operations. Is Lagos State no longer in the South-west? You challenged our people for having forsaken their prime positions in the profession and in industries. Truly, the Yoruba have failed in these areas and we need to wake up. However, I have a case with our governors: Since the fourth republic began, no governor in Ekiti or Ogun state has deemed it fit to establish a rice-processing factory in their respective state to provide employment and bring down the high price of foodstuffs. Oyo state alone has the potential to feed the region but what is happening? You warned against sweeping under the carpet the report of (YSDM) Yoruba Self-Determination Movement’s complaint about the Bodija explosion when the report is out. I like to say here that I will not give you any rest but shall continue to remind you to do what you know best how to do until the authorities concerned do the needful. Thank you very much for your courage and uprightness and for always being there for the people. You are one of the prophets of our time! – Bishop Alli Olu Richard.

 Thanks, Bola, and God bless you! Akintoye is senile; he is crying when the milk is already spilled. What intelligence and security apparatus does the YSDM have in place? Akintoye is a politician. Why the Yoruba have not advanced beyond noise-making is because of people like him, like Gani Adams, the selfish and timid Yoruba governors and the hungry and myopic Yoruba traditional rulers in cahoots with illegal miners of our resources. If they are as honest, bold and have the love of their people in their heart as you always do in your submissions, let them show up, and powerfully too! I am bold to say that there is nothing remaining in One Nigeria! Also, there is nothing on the table for the Yoruba except a bold step is taken. Let Akintoye, going to 90 years, go and rest! By the way, what has the Afenifere achieved for the Yoruba in this dispensation? Was their leader, Pa Ayo Adebanjo, not rooting for a non-Yoruba in the last presidential election? How can people move forward with that kind of mindset? Nigeria has crossed the Rubicon! – Pastor Jube Olawole.

Bola is a former editor of PUNCH newspapers, a public affairs analyst on radio and television.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Opinion

A closer look at finance institutions and agribusinesses

Published

on

By Adewale Kupoluyi

The importance of agriculture in economic development cannot be overstated. Despite the strategic place that agriculture occupies, many financial institutions are unable to extend necessary support as a result of some gaps that need to be closed, if this sector is to remain relevant in the scheme of things in the country. The webinar series are designed to educate the Nigerian business and legal communities on matters affecting the local business environment, and how to navigate the terrain with ease.

This is the position of panelists during the Nigerian Bar Association Section on Business Law (NBA-SBL) Business Law Weekly Season 3, Episode 2 with the theme: “Identifying Challenges in Agricultural Financing: Bridging the Gaps between Financial Institutions and Agribusinesses,” which was put together by the NBA-SBL Agriculture Law Committee. The discourse was moderated by the committee’s Secretary and Editor-in-Chief of FarmingFarmersFarms, Dr. Adewale Kupoluyi, and hosted by the section’s Chair, Aderonke Alex-Adedipe, who was represented the Vice Chair, Joshua Daranijo.

According to the Head, Credit and Marketing Department of NIRSAL Microfinance Bank, Anulika Ijomah, what should be done to change this narrative of not funding agribusinesses properly is to make governments at all levels to give banks soft landing such that loans can be quickly and easily disbursed to farmers and the issue of collateral is resolved. She said that ministries of agriculture should handle extension services and properly train farmers for them to understand agriculture as a business and not seen as mere farming exercise. Ijomah informed that the Nigerian Agricultural Insurance Corporation (NAIC) was set up specifically to provide agricultural risks insurance cover for Nigerian farmers, adding that the government must subsidise farm mechanisation and adequately monitor farmers from the first day of farming up to the moment of harvesting.

The NIRSAL official called for wider conversations between the government and all parties involved in agricultural financing, noting that the required resources had to be provided, and suppliers certified while the issue of insecurity is urgently tackled. She revealed that her bank was ready to assist prospective clients in processing their loans and also do follow-ups after disbursements. She noted that “There is need for wider conversation with government and all parties involved in the agribusiness should be duly informed and there should be proper monitoring of farmers from the first day of production to the point of harvest with subsidised mechanised farming. Our product can align with every phase of the agricultural value-chain, but depending on the farmer’s behaviour, they should present their proposals well for them to finance. Lack of knowledge, cost implication and monetary evaluation are some of the issues farmers are facing.”

Ijomah, however, urged fresh starters in agribusiness to understand how the venture works, saying they must devote their valuable time for the business because of its delicate nature. They should equally have their markets and be sure of what they want to do. Reeling out some of the problems of funding agricultural businesses, the panelist pointed out major ones to include insurance coverage, inability of farmers to manage disease, land leasing, inferior quality of farm inputs, global warming and inadequate collateral, among others. On his part, the Field Officer, ETG Beyondbeans, Dr. Olorunfemi Malomo has made a case for synergy between NIRSAL and the National Orientation Agency (NOA), adding that the agripreneur should be well-informed on available opportunities. He posited that communication was key, adding that farming products should be made affordable and accessible to agripreneurs at the grassroots, saying that the products provided by microfinance banks should be insured.

“We should get rid of organisation bottlenecks as they affect agricultural production. There is a gap between financial institutions and agribusinesses and that many farmers are yet to identify where to get loans or grants. Farmers should be keeping records to make it easy for them to access loans from financial institutions, they should do feasibility studies, engage experts, and know the available resources,” he added. Dr. Malomo revealed that Nigerians love too much of imported goods, saying they should rather change this disposition and patronise locally-made goods in order to help the economy, noting that undue organisational bottlenecks should be look into such that loans can be quickly disbursed to farmers with stern warning to prospective agripreneurs to have funds that would cater for the whole agricultural cycle, saying if funds were not available, they should not bother to start the business at all.

In summary, the parley was really a worthwhile effort that has gone a long way in identifying challenges in agricultural financing in a bid to bridging the gaps between financial institutions and agribusinesses. Getting this done and turning things around would happen when governments at all levels give banks soft landing to make credits to be disbursed to farmers with little or no collateral, when ministries of agriculture handle extension services and properly train farmers to understand agriculture as a business, subsidising farm mechanisation, better monitoring of farmers, making starters in agribusiness to understand how the business works, enhanced communication with farmers as well as patronising agricultural insurance, to mention a few.

The Nigerian Bar Association comprises three professional practice sections, viz: Section on Legal Practice (NBA-SPL), Section on Business Law (NBA-SBL), and Section on Public Interest and Development Law (SPIDEL). The practice sections are designed to equip NBA members with necessary skills for the advancement and exploits in the legal profession. The NBA-SBL was established 20 years ago and has at its apex, a council that is currently chaired by a seasoned lawyer and Managing Partner, Odujinrin & Adeoye, Dr. Adeoye Adefulu with other members in sector-focused committees, such as the Agriculture Law Committee that were established to cover existing and new areas of law with a view to enhancing commercial law practice in Nigeria.

Dr. Kupoluyi is the Secretary, Agriculture Law Committee, Nigerian Bar Association Section on Business Law (NBA-SBL).

Continue Reading

Opinion

Reconvened for greater goods

Published

on

By Opeyemi Bamidele

On June 13, precisely 44 days away from today, the tenth National Assembly—the Senate and House of Representatives—will mark its first anniversary. The anniversary will take place only a day after Democracy Day, a truly historic national day statutorily set aside to commemorate the restoration of democracy in Nigeria in 1999.

The road to this historic day was indeed tortuous, starting on June 12, 1993. This was the day that eligible Nigerians overwhelmingly cast their ballots for the then presidential candidate of the Social Democratic Party (SDP), the late Chief M.K.O. Abiola. But the government of General Ibrahim Badamosi Babangida, the first and only military president Nigeria ever had, annulled the election outcome on June 24, 1993, contrary to popular will.

The process was annulled even when the SDP had already polled 58.36 percent of the counted results, leaving the National Republican Convention (NRC) with only 41.64 percent. The annulment was perhaps the crudest political decision that any government ever made in the history of this nation, taking cognizance of the diverse ugly events that followed it.

Yet, the quest for the restoration of people’s mandate never died until the federal government finally recognised Chief M.K.O. Abiola was the winner of the process. And its implications were grave and unquantifiable for the nation at large. First, the decision prolonged the reign of tyranny by six good years, thereby inflicting varying degrees of setbacks on our economy and polity.

Besides, it culminated in the suspension of the National Assembly, the foremost democratic institution, with the seal of the people’s approval. It perhaps birthed the darkest era in history, which almost indelibly bruised the image of our nation before our long-time development partners and even the entire global community.

That era has now folded into the stinking armpit of history. Its stench keeps reminding us of the gory accounts of what we all suffered at the hands of the late tyrant. But we are now gradually building a democracy that is efficient, proactive, responsive, and vibrant to address the roots of our prevailing challenges. That democracy will officially enter its silver age precisely on June 12.

At the same time, we will be marking the first anniversary of the tenth National Assembly. It will indeed be a day of double celebrations to reflect on how we started, the grievous challenges that beset us on the path to freedom, and the measures we need to adopt to build a truly responsive democracy. And the day will help us put into context the gains of practising a democratic system for 25 unbroken years amid diverse challenges.

For 12 months or thereabouts, we have no doubt recorded moderate political payoffs, considering various interventions we have initiated to deliver collective prosperity, spur national cohesion, and set our fatherland on the path to irreversible growth. Even though we have been able to chart an entirely new path for Nigeria, it is not yet Uhuru, given the enormity of socio-economic and political challenges we are still facing as a federation.

Ahead of the anniversary, however, we are reconvening in the newly renovated hallowed chambers of the National Assembly to discharge our responsibilities as enshrined under Section 4 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended). This is ostensibly an invaluable addition not just to the federal legislators but also to Nigeria, a federation of over 227 million people that the world always looks forward to as the hope of the black nations.

For two consecutive years, we relocated to the committee room on the ground floor of the New Senate Building to conduct core legislative business. Likewise, the House of Representatives moved its sessions to the main committee room on the ground floor of its wings. This movement was due to the intolerable conditions of the two chambers where we were conducting legislative business.

What were the conditions that compelled the legislators to relocate to makeshift chambers that were obviously unconducive and unsuitable for the conduct of legislative business? The worst of such conditions was the leakage of the roofs, which regularly disrupted plenaries and even caused damage to facilities within the two chambers.

Also, the cooling system was dysfunctional, especially in the central lobby, most committee rooms, and other parts of the complex. This no doubt created an unacceptable environment that inhibited the speed at which we were discharging our responsibilities. Among others, there were also challenges with the plumbing system, low-voltage equipment, and public address system, among others.

Each of these challenges necessitated the need to reconfigure, rehabilitate, and upgrade the entire National Assembly Complex to what it is today. After two years of comprehensive maintenance exercises, we now have state-of-the-art chambers where legislators can sit and work seamlessly. We now have a truly world-class work space fitted with modern equipment and technology that will no doubt aid the conduct of legislative business.

Our first thanks go to former President Muhammadu Buhari, the GCFR, and the Federal Capital Development Authority for supporting the budget proposal for the renovation of the entire complex in 2022. We also appreciate President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, GCFR, and Minister of Federal Capital Territory, Mr. Nyesom Wike, CON, for prioritising the renovation of the complex, which has now been fully open for parliamentary activities. Henceforth, we shall conduct the national legislative business in the newly renovated chambers.

Now that we have resumed full legislative business, the weeks ahead promise to be busy and engaging for all legislators alike. In part, this may be associated with issues of national priority that require immediate parliamentary intervention. It may also be connected to diverse bills, for which we are duty-bound to expedite their passage in order to deepen the roots of public governance nationwide.

In the coming weeks, therefore, we will be interfacing with the core managers of our economy to ensure stability in our fiscal and monetary spaces. We understand the value of the naira has been galloping in the last five weeks. During Easter, for instance, the naira recorded 32.6 percent appreciation. Just after Eid-el-Fitr, the naira further appreciated by 42 percent. Currently, however, its value has again dropped, hovering between ¦ 1,250 and ¦ 1,300.

Obviously, the galloping value of the naira simply suggests that we need to adopt a collaborative approach first to strengthen existing measures and work out alternative measures that will decisively address the root causes of its depreciation. It also suggests the need to further carry out purpose-driven oversight of fiscal policies, robust engagement with the core managers of the economy, and initiating strategic interventions aimed at supporting real sectors.

Also, the need to recalibrate our security architecture will be at the core of our legislative priorities. Nearly all stakeholders now agree that the security architecture is no longer responsive enough to guarantee the security of lives nationwide. As demonstrated during the national policy dialogue recently organised by the House of Representatives, we are gradually building a national consensus on how best we can address our security challenges.

Security is everything, whether in Nigeria or elsewhere. It is the main pillar on which the state system was built. And its absence is at the root of other heinous challenges we are facing today. Aside from its human cost, insecurity is a source of economic harm that we must permanently stop as soon as we can. It has driven thousands of farmers from their farmlands, complicating the food crisis we are working hard to address. It is also a critical factor responsible for the decline in the flows of foreign direct investment into this nation.

All these issues deserve more decisive legislative attention than at any time in history. The process has already commenced with the inauguration of the Committee on the Review of the 1999 Constitution. The committee, chaired by the Deputy President of the Senate, Senator Jibrin Barau, has been collaborating with critical stakeholders to work out an entirely new security architecture that responds more efficiently to our security challenges.

But the National Assembly cannot do it alone, and neither can the Presidency. It is a collective responsibility for all critical actors: the media, civil society, traditional institutions, private sector religious bodies, and all socio-cultural groups. We are all under obligation to play pivotal roles in the task of rebuilding a federation that works for all.

Bamidele, leader of the 10th Senate, writes from Abuja.

Continue Reading

Opinion

Charting the course – Who dares, wins!

Published

on

By Constantine ‘Labi Ogunbiyi

The African continent stands at a pivotal juncture in the global energy sector, with abundant oil and gas reserves offering immense potential for economic growth. However, while the continent holds significant promise, navigating the upstream oil and gas sector in Africa comes with a plethora of risks and potential setbacks that demand careful consideration and strategic planning. This is against a backdrop of cutbacks in international capital for carbon-intensive oil and gas developments and increasing competition for the same sources of capital. Innovative financing solutions are thus required to fill the void, but can only be truly successful if tailored to specific needs and adopted and respected by all stakeholders.

Nigeria, Africa’s largest oil producer, epitomises the complexities and opportunities within the continent’s energy sector. Over the past decade, the Nigerian oil and gas industry has grappled with insecurity, asset vandalism, and community unrest, leading to a decline in investment. This coupled with the need for the sanctity of contracts and a properly structured fiscal framework has seen investment in the sector decline to about US$5 billion per annum from highs of about US$22 billion per annum in 2012.

Nigeria has an abundance of unexploited discovered natural gas (as well as significant prospective gas resources), now heralded as a “clean” transition fuel amidst global energy shifts. Nigeria should seek to attract significant investment during this transition era (which has also seen crude oil prices rebound) to take full advantage of this, thus retaining the value of crude oil and gas resources to enable it to position itself for its energy transition (towards net zero) agenda. A just energy transition, the paradigm that gained impetus at the December 2023 COP28 Conference, is intended to decelerate financing fossil fuel developments while supporting those most vulnerable to the impacts of climate change when facilitating the transition to clean energy. This is not simply a tweak to existing systems; it is a fundamental transformation towards a cleaner, more sustainable future. This shift is driven by environmental concerns, the changing balance of power on the global stage, and awareness that the energy-producing nations in the Global South (which produce only a fraction of global emissions) should be given a chance to “catch up” industrially, technological advancement as consumer demands. It is estimated that the country needs about US$25 billion of annual investment in the next 10 years to achieve crude oil output of three to four million barrels per day and 3 bcf per day of gas production for domestic consumption (an ambition). A lack of available infrastructure, whether because of existing compromised infrastructure through age or sabotage or simply a lack of new investment, and competition for capital regionally, poses challenges that will need to be overcome to achieve this. Inadequate infrastructure impedes the development and operation of oil and gas projects in Africa, increases project costs, delays timelines, and heightens operational risks.

The new Government has declared that it is “open for business” and will take urgent steps towards solving the fiscal, regulatory, security, and other issues discouraging investment and operations in the nation’s petroleum sector – something that is urgently required to help to push its oil and gas production to the ambitious levels being targeted. The mechanisms are in place – the Petroleum Industry Act (PIA) has done a lot to bring an enabling framework to the industry, including by allowing the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) and its subsidiaries to raise capital on their own balance sheets, whether by divestitures or development partnerships on their blocks (including risk service contracts, financial and technical service agreements and the likes), crude forward sales, debt or equity capital raisings, etc. Still, there is a need to focus more on implementing the PIA in a manner that restores investors’ confidence and boosts oil and gas production, ultimately increasing jobs, the country’s earnings, and prosperity. Whilst international commodity traders have increased their activity and funding of oil production in Nigeria, they rarely support the development of appraisal and near-production assets. Access to innovative capital structures for such capital-intensive projects, involving a more risk-reward approach will be key to developing such assets, as will the deepening of regional capital markets to bolster the capital available from institutions such as the African Export-Import Bank and planned new initiatives such as the African Energy Bank. Effectively, more “home-grown” solutions will be required.

As international oil companies shift focus to deep offshore and gas-rich assets, indigenous companies and smaller operators are stepping in to fill the void. However, accessing capital remains challenging. Innovative financing models, such as the contractor risk service  model, offer a promising solution. This model, which involves contractors taking financial risks and receiving payment from production, incentivizes efficient asset development while mitigating risk for owners and operators.

The contractor taking such risk, is effectively a co-financier of, and investor in, the development of the oil block – ensuring a service that would otherwise require immediate payment, to benefit from payment from oil and gas production (therein lies the contractor risk).

The success of such models hinges on the support of all stakeholders, including operators, joint venture partners, financiers, regulatory authorities, and local communities. By aligning incentives and sharing risks, these partnerships can drive sustainable development and enhance investor returns. The recent completion of the FSO ELI Akaso infrastructure project by the Century Group (CG) (part of an alternative crude oil evacuation system (ACOES)), facilitated by the contractor risk service model, exemplifies the potential for collaboration to unlock value and foster growth. The ACOES is being developed as a result of the need to enhance production and supply security from oil blocks in the Eastern Niger Delta due to infractions and prolonged outages of the Nembe Creek Trunkline (historically one of Nigeria’s major oil transportation arteries evacuating up to 150,000 bopd of crude from the Niger Delta to the Atlantic coast for export). The CG model is “Made-in-Nigeria-for-Nigeria” but can be rolled out regionally (and globally too), in countries where access to capital for oil and gas developments is tough. Contractors work in a vacuum: the aim of which is to optimise oil production to ensure that their clients thrive so that they do too. However, they rarely take financial and production risk executing a “pay-as-you-go” model (often including mobilisation and other hefty prepayment-type fees), which can leave operators hanging where assets under-perform. They also get the job done without involving themselves in the issues that may affect joint venture partner relationships.

Local and international investors, including UK-listed San Leon Energy plc, World Carrier Corporation, and GT Bank plc have invested heavily in Energy Link Infrastructure Limited (ELI), the sponsor of the ACOES and owner of the FSO ELI Akaso and relevant pipeline infrastructure to develop the ACOES. With the advent of COVID and a lack of production available from anchor clients, ELI needed to look for alternative sources of capital to ensure that the FSO ELI Akaso is ready for operations. Without CG’s involvement in a contractor risk service model, the FSO would not be operationally ready and now established as a terminal for oil export. As the Akaso starts to take on barrels from various oil producers, the business should thrive. CG, as an investor by the application of its contractor risk service model, should also be rewarded and feted for having stood by the business at a time when access to alternative capital was proving difficult. With the success of this approach, CG is ensuring that the contractor risk service model should be considered by the industry as an alternative, proactive, and additional funding source for the development of energy projects.

Looking ahead, achieving sustainable development in Africa’s oil and gas sector demands collaborative action from all stakeholders. Local investors, operators, and contractors play a crucial role in de-risking opportunities and crafting an appealing investment narrative that attracts capital. By leveraging local expertise and fostering partnerships, these stakeholders can unlock the sector’s full potential while mitigating risks. Regulatory frameworks also play a pivotal role in shaping the investment landscape. It is imperative that these frameworks prioritize ease of doing business and uphold contract sanctity to instil confidence among investors. Additionally, addressing bottlenecks to investment and exits is critical for maintaining investor interest and sustaining growth momentum. Addressing the need to resolve the long-standing saga and delay in the consummation of the $1.3 billion ExxonMobil sale of its 40% stake in Mobil Producing Nigeria Unlimited (MPNU) to Seplat Nigeria Plc, the Nigerian Minister of State for Petroleum Resources, Heineken Lokpobiri said on 16th April 2024: “Now that the whole world is campaigning against investment in fossil fuel, if we close this transaction and Seplat expands their investments, Bonga North, which is predicated on that resolution, comes on board, and the whole world will know that Nigeria has become a new investment destination and that is the objective of this government.”

In charting the course for Africa’s upstream oil and gas industry, daring innovations and strategic partnerships will be indispensable. By embracing risk and seizing opportunities, the continent can harness its energy potential to drive economic prosperity and sustainable development for generations to come. More local investors, operators and contractors (like Century Group) will need to step up to help to de-risk opportunities and ensure the investment narrative is attractive, properly articulated and understood. With traditional international financing techniques becoming more difficult to secure for oil and gas projects, the contractor risk service model is an invaluable additional tool to ensure the continuing development of energy projects.

About the Author

Constantine ‘Labi Ogunbiyi has been involved in the energy (including renewables), fintech, and logistics sectors as an investor, Strategic Advisor, and/or Director on several boards. He has more than twenty-five years of experience in international capital markets, private equity, acquisition, structured, trade and project finance, and public and private partnerships in the African energy, technology, and infrastructure sectors, in particular. Labi,  was a founder and Executive Director of Afren plc responsible for business development, strategy, and growth, leading Afren’s negotiating team in Nigerian acquisitions and equity and debt financings (capital raising of more than $1.7 billion) between 2005 and 2009. In 2009, he founded First Hydrocarbon Nigeria Limited (FHN), a leading indigenous upstream oil and gas exploration and production company in Nigeria, and functioned as its Chief Executive Officer, selling the business in 2013.

Presently, he runs his family office, Phoenix Generation Limited, a direct investment and strategic investment advisory service company. He holds Legal Qualifications from the Universities of London (King’s College), Passau (Germany), and the Oxford Institute of Legal Practice.

Continue Reading

Trending