Ogun Election Tribunal: Evidences before Tribunal enough for us to defend Abiodun’s mandate —  INEC

…As INEC closes case at Ogun tribunal

The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) on Wednesday told the Governorship  Election Petition Tribunal sitting in Abeokuta metropolis that the plethora of evidences before the panel were enough to defend the mandate of Governor Dapo Abiodun, declined to call any witness.

Recall that PDP and Adebutu in the petition marked, EPT/OG/GOV/03/2023 are challenging the victory of Abiodun based on alleged non-compliance with the Electoral Act.

In his petition, Adebutu alleged that elections were disrupted by thugs in over 99 polling units, disenfranchising over 40,000 voters from participating in the March 18 election.

The petitioners, through their counsel, Chris Uche, had closed their case last Thursday after calling 94 witnesses and tendering over 200,000 documents in evidence.

The petitioners called as witnesses, voters and party agents from Sagamu, Ikenne, Remo North, Odogbolu, Ogun Waterside, Ijebu-Ode, Abeokuta South, Abeokuta North, Ado-Odo/Ota and others, to prove that there were disruptions.

The petitioner also subpoenaed two INEC ad-hoc staff, an official of the West African Examination Council (WAEC), a statistician and a forensic analyst to give evidence before the tribunal.

Adebutu also tendered certified true copies of INEC result sheets, voters registers, printouts from the Bimodal Voters Accreditation (BVAS) machines, incident forms, video evidence, forensic reports and other documents.

However, all the witnesses called by the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) across the State presented similar statements, with substantial contradictory positions after being thoroughly cross examined.

Also, its star witness and expert invited by the party came up with huge discrepancies and irreconcilable data in their separate presentations, thereby, making Counsel to the 1st respondent( INEC) Olumide Ogidan, SAN, to submit that the substantial grounds needed to be argued through witnesses’ statements had been explicitly established before the Tribunal during cross examination.

Ogidan, therefore, prayed the panel for the 1st respondent to close its case,  that is even as he solicited for more days to attend to issues surrounding the reply  of the Petitioners, citing exigencies at Presidential Election Petition Tribunal in Abuja.

In the same vein, Counsel to the 2nd respondent (Governor Dapo Abiodun) Professor Taiwo Osipitan,SAN, aligned with the prayer of the Counsel to the 1st respondent, saying all the Counsels to respondents were on the same page on prayer for more days to move to Abuja and for the new subpoenae to get prepared.

Also, Counsel to the 3rd respondent(APC)  Mr Tayo Oyetibo,  SAN, restated before the panel of a new application which had just been served on the petitioners and other respondents on the ground that the paragraphs of the Petitioners’ reply and witnesses’  statements  on OATH  sought to be struck  out but introduced new facts tending to add to the content of the petition.

He added that the  paragraphs  under review were highly prejudicial to the third respondent

According to him,  the new allegations of fact pleaded in some paragraphs of the Petitioners’  reply raised  issues  which the third respondent could not have the opportunity to respond to.

Meanwhile, Counsel to the petitioners, Gordy Uche, SAN, in his response said, “We have been served with the application but we shall vehemently oppose the application.”

The tribunal, in its ruling  said the adjournment became necessary despite the fact that it didn’t want to prepare judgement in an hurry, it, however, adjourned the case till Friday, 4th August, 2023.