Connect with us

Top Story

How courts affirm Adewoyin as substantive National President of IPMAN —Investigation

Published

on

The leadership battle plaguing the Independent Petroleum Marketers Association of Nigeria (IPMAN) seems to have neared its end as investigation affirmed Chief Kolawole Adewoyin as the authentic National President of the Union, investigation revealed.

Since 2014, the association has been enmeshed in a leadership crisis and protracted legal battle on the authentic leadership of the National Executive Committee of IPMAN.

While it has been a been serious tussle between Engineer Sanusi Abdu Fari and Elder Chinedu Okoronkwo, Judgments from both High Court and Appeal Court have however affirmed that Chief (Dr) Kolawole Adewoyin is actually the authentic National President of IPMAN.

The court documents also shows that the selection of Alhaji Debo Ahmed by Engineer Sanusi Abdul Fari to succeed him as IPMAN National President was illegal.

Investigations showed that Chief (Dr) Kolawole Adewoyin has many favourable court judgements against Engineer Sanusi Abdu Fari, Debo Ahmed and Elder Chinedu Okoronkwo.

In  one of the cases filed on the 26th of June 2020 by Chief (Dr) Kolawole Adewoyin at the Federal High Court, Ibadan, against Engineer Sanusi Abdul Fari and his National Executive Council of IPMAN, Alhaji Debo Ahmed and the Registered Trustees of IPMAN and which a judgement was delivered by Justice J.O Abdulmalik on the 18th of November 2020.

ORDER OF THE COURT

Upon this originating summons dated 25th of June 2020 and filed on the 26th of June 2020, coming up before this Honourable Court for Judgment on the 18th day of November 2020 seeking the following reliefs:

  1. A Declaration that the continuous occupation of the office of National President of IPMAN by the 1st Defendant after his expiration of his three years in office is wrongful and a gross violation of Article IX of the Independent Petroleum Marketers Association of Nigeria (IPMAN) 1997 Constitution.
  2. A Declaration that the Plaintiff who was elected and sworn in on 20 March, 2017 as National Deputy President as Deputy to the 1st Defendant is lawful and rightful person to take over as (IPMAN) National President in accordance to the principle of automatic succession enshrined in Article IX of the 1997 IPMAN’s Constitution.
  3. A Declaration that the Plaintiff, Chief (Dr) Kolawole Adewoyin has been duly sworn in as National President of the Independent Petroleum Marketers Association of Nigeria (IPMAN).

3rd Defendant and be recognized as such by the members and board of Trustees of the 3rd Defendant.

An Order of perpetual injunction restraining the Defendants their Executive members, agents privies and however described from parading the 1st and 2nd Defendants as National President and Deputy National President of the 3rd Defendant.

An Order directing the 1st Defendant whose tenure expired and ended on 21st March 2020 to immediately vacate office, deliver and hand over the office to the Plaintiff as the duly elected National President of Independent Petroleum Marketers Association of Nigeria (IPMAN) in line with the Article IX of the 1997 Constitution of Independent Petroleum Marketers Association of Nigeria 1997.

An Order of Perpetual Injunction restraining the 1st and 2nd Defendants or any other persons whatsoever either by themselves, agents, privies, associates, corroborators or whatsoever called, from parading themselves as the National President or Deputy National President of the 3rd Defendant.

Any Further Order or Orders this Honourable Court may deem fit to make in the circumstances of this case.

Upon reading the affidavit in support of the originating summons deposed by Chief Kolawole Adewoyin, Adult, Male Christian, Nigeria Citizen of No 10, Ibadan/Lagos Express road, Ayetoro, Toll Gate area, Ibadan, Oyo State.

And after Hearing, M.O. Oladejo Esquire Counsel to the Plaintiff who moved the Amended Originating Summons and urged the Court to grant the application, while Adeshina Olaniyan Esquire Counsel to the Defendants/ Respondents who opposed the said Application. And both counsels adopted their written submission.

And the Court having delivered its Judgment today the 18th day of November 2020.

IT IS HEREBY DECLARED As FOLLOWS: That the continuous occupation of the officer of National President of IPMAN by the 1 Defendant after his expiration of his three years in office is wrongful and a gross violation of Article IX of the Independent Petroleum Marketers Association of Nigeria (IPMAN) 1997 Constitution.

That the Plaintiff who was elected and sworn in on 20th March 2017 as National Deputy President as deputy to the 1s Defendant is Lawful and rightful person to take over as (IPMAN) National President in accordance to the principle of automatic succession enshrined in Article IX of the 1997 IPMAN’s Constitution.

That the Plaintiff, Chief (Dr) Kolawole Adewoyin be duly sworn in as National President of the 3rd Defendant and be recognised as such by the members and Board of Trustees of the 3rd Defendant.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: AN ORDER of perpetual injunction is granted restraining the Defendants their executive members, agents, privies, and however described from parading the 1st and 2nd Defendants as National President and Deputy National President of the 3rd Defendant.

That the 1st Defendant whose tenure expired and indeed on the 21st March 2017 shall immediately vacate office, deliver and hand over the office to the Plaintiff as the duly elected National President of Independent Petroleum Marketers Association of Nigeria (IPMAN) in line with the Article IX of the 1997 Constitution of Independent Petroleum Marketers Association of Nigeria 1997.

AN ORDER of Perpetual Injunction is granted restraining the 1st and 2nd Defendants or any other person whatsoever either by themselves, agents, privies, associates, corroborators or whatsoever called, from parading themselves as the National President and Deputy National President of the 3rd Defendant.

It was Issued at IBADAN under the Seal of Court and the Hand of the Presiding on this 18th day of November, 2020.

Also an originating summons from Federal High Court of Nigeria, Abuja Division was served on Elder Chinedu Okororonkwo and two registered trustees of Independent Petroleum Marketers Association of Nigeria in 2021.

ORIGINATING SUMMONS BROUGHT IN PURSUANT TO ORDER 3 AND 4 OF THE FEDERAL HIGH COURT (CIVIL PROCEDURE) RULES, 2019: ARTICLE IX AND IX (iii) OF THE 1997 CONSTITUTION OF THE INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM MARKETERS ASSOCIATION OF NIGERIA (IPMAN AND UNDER THE INHERENT JURISDICTION OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT.

Elder Chinedu Okoronkwo and (2) the Registered Trustees Of Independent Petroleum Marketers Association Of Nigeria (IPMAN) whose address is No 41, Gnassingbe Eyadema Street, Asokoro, Abuja and No 3 Jabba Close off Dunukofia Street by FCDA Minister’s Gate, Area 11, Abuja, FCE, Within 30 days after service of this summons on them, inclusive of the day of such service cause an appearance to be entered for them to this summons which is issued upon the application of Chief (Dr) Kolawole Adewoyin (the Plaintiff, whose address is  No. 10 lbadan, Lagos/Ibadan Express Road, Ayetoro Toll Gate Area, Ibadan, Oyo State  for the determination of the following Questions/issues:

  1. Whether the Plaintiff who was duly elected and sworn in on 20 March, 2017 as National Deputy President of the Independent Petroleum Marketers Association of Nigeria can validly take over as the President in line with the principle of automatic succession enshrined in Article IX of the 1997 Constitution of the Independent Petroleum Marketers Association of Nigeria?
  2. Whether the 13 Defendant who was never validly elected by the members of the 2 Defendant can parade himself as the National President of the 2 Defendant against the rights of the Plaintiff who by the Constitution of the 2 Defendant is entitled to automatically take over and be sworn in as the National President of Independent Petroleum Marketers Association of Nigeria (IPMAN).
  3. Whether by the Spirit and letters of the 1997 Constitution of the Independent Petroleum Marketers Association of Nigeria, article IX, the Plaintiff can automatically take over.

Further investigations showed that after competent courts of law have declared Chief (Dr) Kolawole Adewoyin as the authentic National President of IPMAN, the duo of Elder Chinedu Okoronkwo and Alhaji Debo Ahmed are still claiming to be National Presidents of IPMAN.

Also in a new judgment delivered by Court of Appeal, Ibadan, on August 5, 2022, the Court affirmed Chief Kolawole Adewoyin is the authentic National President of the Independent Petroleum Marketers Association of Nigeria (IPMAN).

The new judgement delivered by Justice Kenneth Ikechukwu Amadi has now brought an end to the lingering leadership crisis facing the Independent Petroleum Marketers Association of Nigeria (IPMAN) in the country.

In the ruling and judgement at the Court of Appeal Ibadan, the Judge, Kenneth Ikechukwu Amadi berated the duo of Engineer Sanusi Abdullahi Fari and Debo Ahmed for refusing to vacate the office of National President of IPMAN.

The Appeal Court held that the 1997 constitution is unambiguous, and unanimously affirmed the Federal High Court judgement of 18th November 2020.

The Appellate Court also ordered both Engineer  Sanusi Abdullahi Fari and Ahmed Debo to vacate and henceforth desist from parading themselves or any of their proxies from laying claims, exercising, carrying out the functions of the National President of IPMAN other than Chief Dr. Kolawole Adewoyin.

The Court also slammed a fine of N300,000,00  against Engineer Sanusi Abdullahi Fari and Ahmed Debo and ordered that the money be paid to Chief Dr. Kolawole Adewoyin.

Top Story

Account enrollment: Court validates CBN’s regulation, permits collection of customers’ social media handles

Published

on

…Dismisses concerns, says social media handles not protected by privacy rights

…Financial institutions cleared to collect social media handles for KYC

By Sodiq Adelakun

The Federal High Court in Lagos has ruled in favour of the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) in a case challenging the regulation that requires financial institutions to collect their customers’ social media handles as part of the Know-Your-Customer (KYC) procedure.

Recall that the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) had urged the court to compel CBN to withdraw its directive to banks and other financial institutions.

However, in the ruling, Justice Nnamdi Dimgba struck out the suit filed by Lagos-based lawyer, Chris Eke, who argued that the regulation violates the right to privacy of bank customers.

Eke had sought a declaration that the regulation contained in Section 6(a) (iv) of the Central Bank of Nigeria (Customer Due Diligence) Regulations, 2023, is undemocratic, unconstitutional, null, and void, as it contradicts Section 37 of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended). However, Justice Dimgba ruled that the regulation does not breach the right to privacy of bank customers.

The CBN regulation is targeted to enhance customer due diligence and anti-money laundering measures, and requires banks to collect social media handles, among other personal information, from their customers.

The applicant had asked the court to grant an order of perpetual injunction, restraining CB from enforcing the regulation which requires financial institutions to request customers’ social media handles as part of normal bank customer due diligence requirements.

The CBN in its response to the suit, filed a notice of preliminary objection, challenging the competence of the suit. The apex bank also disagreed that the said regulation constitutes any interference with the private life of the applicant, as claimed.

The judgment came as Justice Dimgba dismissed a suit, stating that the notice of preliminary objection held merit and consequently struck out the case.

During the proceedings, Justice Dimgba emphasised that providing a social media handle is akin to furnishing email addresses, phone numbers, and other contact details for banking purposes.

He argued that such information aids in conducting due diligence to ascertain if an individual is suitable for conducting business with a bank.

Justice Dimgba further explained that the essence of having a social media account implies a willingness to engage in public communication, thus rendering privacy concerns unfounded.

According to him, “First, the Applicant claims that the requirements on the CBN Regulations for financial institutions to request and collect the social media handle of its customers as part of KYC infringes on his right to privacy.”

“This claim is very ambitious and amounts to a very far throw.  The said Regulations are directed to and apply to financial institutions. It does not apply to private individuals such as the Applicant.

“Even if, as appears to be argued, that the Regulations itself would inevitably affect the Applicant, this claim is speculative for the simple reason that in nowhere in the affidavit in support was it stated that the Applicant operates an account with a financial institution and that the said institution had demanded his social media handle.  So the suggestion that he would be affected by this Regulation, albeit negatively, is very speculative and at large.

“Secondly, there is also no deposition to the effect that any financial institution had begun to implement this Regulation and that its implementation had begun to create disruptions and inconvenience against the general population, in which case one could infer that the suit should be legitimated as a public interest litigation.

“Thirdly, assuming even that the banks had begun to implement these regulations, the applicant assuming he maintained any bank accounts or sought to open one, but is being hindered or irritated by the requirement of the Regulation to avail his social media handle as part of KYC, the Applicant still had a choice, which is to refuse to do business with any bank insisting on the information as part of its social media handle, but to seek other alternatives.

“Fourthly, and for all it is worth, I do not see how asking a banking or potential banking customer to provide his social media handle can ever amount to a breach of privacy.

“Granted that Section 37 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended) provides inter alia: The privacy of citizens, their homes, correspondence, telephone conversations and telegraphic communications is hereby guaranteed and protected.

“My view is that the provision of a social media handle is of the same genre as the provision of email address, phone numbers and other means by which a potential customer of a bank can be contacted.

“Thus, it is clear from the face of the Regulations as set out above that email addresses, phone numbers and social media handles are all provided for under clause 6iv just to show that the aim was not to pry on anyone but rather to provide alternative ways by which a customer of the bank can be contacted, and or due diligence conducted on the person to determine if the person is a fit and proper person to extend banking services to.

“I do not see how this infringes on the right to privacy. I should even say that the essence of having a social media account was for one to be publicly visible communication-wise.  It, therefore, appears quite ironic, though wryly, that one can suggest that asking for information about a social media handle with which the individual exposes and immerses himself or herself in the public, can amount to a violation of privacy rights, which rights itself is all about isolation of one from public glare.

“It is also to my knowledge that even in filling some business applications,  personal information of this sort, is sometimes requested, and parties generally oblige. If it does not constitute a breach of privacy, why should it now?

“A social media handle is left at large for the world to see, being in the public space, everyone enjoys the liberty to have access to it whether or not consent was obtained. It would be highly unreasonable to hold the Respondent in breach of privacy for what other persons have access to.

“The apprehension of the Applicant of his social interactions being monitored is manifestly speculative in itself and rather incredulous to believe that the financial institutions have the luxury of time to concern itself with such frivolities.

“On the whole, if I did not sustain the NPO, I would have dismissed the suit for the reasons stated. But the NPO having been sustained, the suit is therefore hereby struck out.”

Continue Reading

Top Story

N1.3trn power debt: Tinubu approves payment, unveils plan to liquidate gas debts

Published

on

President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has given approval for the payment of N1.3trn legacy debts owed power generation companies.

Minister of Power, Chief Adebayo Adelabu speaking at the 8th Africa Energy Market Place 2024 in Abuja said that President Bola Tinubu has approved a plan to liquidate the debts.

According to him, “Mr. President has approved the submission made by the Minister of State Petroleum (Gas) to defray the outstanding debts owed to the gas supply companies to power generation companies. The payments are in two parts, the legacy debts and the current debts. For the current debt, approval has been given to pay about N130 billion from the gas stabilisation fund which the Federal Ministry of Finance will pay.”

“The payment of the legacy debt will be made from future royalties in exchange for incomes in the gas subsector which is quite satisfactory to the gas suppliers. This will allow the companies to enter into firm contracts with power generation companies.

“For the power generation companies, the debt is about N1.3 trillion and I can also tell you that we have the consent of the President to pay, on the condition that the actual figures are reconciled between the government and the companies. This we have successfully done and it is being signed off by both parties now. Majority has signed off and we are engaging to ensure that we have 100 percent sign off.

“The debt will be paid in two ways, immediate cash injection and through a guaranteed debt instrument, preferably a promissory note. This assures the companies that in the next three to five years, the government is ready to defray these debts.”

The Minister further stated that the government was working to get the distribution companies solvent and effective by unbundling their operations along state boundaries.

He insisted that the areas covered by the current DisCos were too large for them to deliver effective services to consumers.

In the same vein, the Chairman of the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC), Engr. Sanusi Garba lamented the poor financial state of the DisCos, noting that it is difficult for them to raise the needed capital to invest.

Engr. Garba pointed out that the challenges facing the sector were a culmination of all past inactions and missteps by those saddled with the responsibilities of managing the sector both at policy and operational levels.

According to him, “Today when you look at distribution companies they are clearly and technically insolvent, and you also want them to raise capital in terms of debt or equity. It’s a Herculean task. I also want to mention that implementing the power sector reform requires very strong political will to implement decisions that impact on the wider public.”

However, the African Development Bank (AfDB) disclosed that it has so far spent over $450 million to support various power sector projects and programmes with another $1 billion planned to support the power sector reform effort by the government.

Continue Reading

Top Story

Emirates Airline to resume Lagos-Dubai flights October 1

Published

on

Emirates Airline has disclosed that it will resume services to Nigeria from October 1, 2024, operating a daily service between Lagos and Dubai.

This development was announced in a statement on Thursday by the airline, which has its hub in the United Arab Emirates (UAE).

The airline disclosed that flight services will be operated using a Boeing 777-300ER.

“We are excited to resume our services to Nigeria. The Lagos-Dubai service has traditionally been popular with customers in Nigeria and we hope to reconnect leisure and business travellers to Dubai and onwards to our network of over 140 destinations.

“We thank the Nigerian government for their partnership and support in re-establishing this route and we look forward to welcoming passengers back onboard,” Emirates’ Deputy President and Chief Commercial Officer, Adnan Kazim, said.

Recall that Emirates Airlines had suspended its Dubai-Lagos flights in 2022 over its inability to repatriate trapped funds in Nigeria in the heat of the diplomatic row between the two countries.

This comes after Festus Keyamo, Minister Of Aviation And Aerospace Development in a post on his X (formerly Twitter) page had disclosed that he got correspondence from Emirates Airline when he visited Salem Saeed Al-Shamsi, ambassador of the United Arab Emirates (UAE) in Abuja.

 ”Yesterday, I paid a working visit to the Ambassador of the UAE to Nigeria, His Excellency, Salem Saeed Al-Shamsi at the UAE Embassy in Abuja. He handed me a correspondence from the Emirates Airline indicating a definite date for their resumption of flights to Nigeria,” Keyamo said.

Continue Reading

Trending