Connect with us

Top Story

FG confirms purchase of N1.4bn vehicles for Niger Republic

Published

on

By Uthman Salami, Ariemu Ogaga and Matthew Denis

Despite worrisome debts rate, the ongoing industrial action by members of the Academic Staff Union of University (ASUU) over pittance salary and deplorable state of teaching environments in universities across the country, the federal government has confirmed that it approved the purchase of vehicles worth N1.4 billion for neighbouring Niger Republic to tackle insecurity.

In a move described by critics as height of wastefulness of taxpayers’ earnings, misplaced priority fiscal intervention and lack of empathy to the yearnings of Nigerian students whose academic aspirations have been further elongated by extra months owing to over five months of lecturers industrial actions, the federal government said the financial intervention was intended to help the neighbouring Benin Republic to combat insecurity.

Recall that on March 4, 2022, the Buhari-led federal government had announced the donation of $1 million to Afghanistan a Muslim country, which many Nigerians described as financial recklessness.

Yesterday, while explaining the rationale behind the approval of the intervention, the Minister of Finance, Budget, and National Planning, Zainab Ahmed said such a move was not new and that it is within the prerogative of the President to make approval for such purchase.

According to her, President Buhari, whose actions she cannot question, has the right to make his own assessment of situations and give directives accordingly.

She added that the financial support, which is primarily for the purpose of enhancing capacity to protect their territory, based on a request by the Nigerien Government, is also in the best interest of Nigeria.

Meanwhile, Nigerians have expressed disappointment over the federal government’s financial recklessness.

Speaking with Nigerian NewsDirect yesterday, Barr. Ameh Madaki said Nigerians should demand accountability for unbudgeted expenditures.

According to him, “Nigerians are understandably outraged at the spate of largesse from this Government towards Niger Republic.

“Just as the citizens continue to grapple with the rationale of extending a rail line from Jibiya to Maradi in Niger Republic at great cost to an ailing National economy, this news of the N1.4 billion largesse on SUVs for Niger Republic government officials breaks, even as the government continues to battle with dwindling revenues accruing to the Federation Account.”

He added that, “There is certainly much more to this than meets the eye. A responsible National Assembly should be demanding accountability for this unbudgeted expenditure in the midst of national economic distress.”

On his part, the Lead Strategist of Nigerian Workforce Strategy and Enlightenment Centre (NIWOSEC), Dr David Kayode Ehindero said, “This is the height of insensitivity on the part of Federal Government.

“Charity, they say, begins at home. But Mr president’s Charity is more of outside Nigeria.

“It seems the President is actually related to Niger Republic as insinuated by some quarters, which warranted attention on Niger Republic.”

According to him, “The wanton of security and economic issues bedevilling Nigeria as the unending ASUU requests, which is yet to be met, is a matter of concern, the Government claims they don’t have money. This, notwithstanding, they are spending so much on frivolities”

Also, the former aide to President Goodluck Jonathan, Mr. Reno Omokri said Nigerians should not be surprised over Buhari’s wastefulness, noting that the actions of the president laid further credence to the calls of his impeachment.

In his words, “Why are Nigerians surprised that General Buhari bought vehicles worth N1.4 billion to Niger Republic? This is after all the same man that donated $1 million to the Taliban of Afghanistan.

“Buhari should have been impeached by the Senate last week. It’s not too late!”

Speaking via his verified Twitter handle, Senator Shehu Sani expressed sadness over lack of proper Senate’s scrutiny of such intervention, questioning how such approval for the intervention could pass the chambers without raising any eyebrow.

He said, “The question is, how does the purchase of vehicles for the Government of Niger Republic escape the oversight functions of the National Assembly.”

Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) urged the President to seek for the refund of the N1.4 billion to offset the funding for ASUU.

“The Buhari administration must immediately ask Niger Republic authorities to refund the N1.4 billion approved for them to buy vehicles, and use the money to offset the funding for ASUU, so that poor children can go back to school.”

Special Assistant to the president Buhari on Digital and New Media Tolu Ogunlesi supported the Minster’s of Finance stance, saying that such intervention by Nigeria to other countries was not new.

He said, “This is not the first time Nigeria is supporting her neighbours (Niger, Chad, Cameroon, Benin) in ways like this. The President has a responsibility to assess requests made (for support) and to approve if he feels it’s in the best interest of Nigeria to do so.”

Currently, Nigeria’s total debt stock hit N41.6 trillion in the first quarter of 2022, representing a N2.05 trillion increase compared to N39.56 trillion recorded in December last year.

This is just as Nigeria’s oil production between January 2020 and May 2022 dropped below the 2017-2019 output by 28 per cent, a decrease the authorities have blamed on rising crude oil theft in the oil-producing Niger Delta.

Top Story

Account enrollment: Court validates CBN’s regulation, permits collection of customers’ social media handles

Published

on

…Dismisses concerns, says social media handles not protected by privacy rights

…Financial institutions cleared to collect social media handles for KYC

By Sodiq Adelakun

The Federal High Court in Lagos has ruled in favour of the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) in a case challenging the regulation that requires financial institutions to collect their customers’ social media handles as part of the Know-Your-Customer (KYC) procedure.

Recall that the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) had urged the court to compel CBN to withdraw its directive to banks and other financial institutions.

However, in the ruling, Justice Nnamdi Dimgba struck out the suit filed by Lagos-based lawyer, Chris Eke, who argued that the regulation violates the right to privacy of bank customers.

Eke had sought a declaration that the regulation contained in Section 6(a) (iv) of the Central Bank of Nigeria (Customer Due Diligence) Regulations, 2023, is undemocratic, unconstitutional, null, and void, as it contradicts Section 37 of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended). However, Justice Dimgba ruled that the regulation does not breach the right to privacy of bank customers.

The CBN regulation is targeted to enhance customer due diligence and anti-money laundering measures, and requires banks to collect social media handles, among other personal information, from their customers.

The applicant had asked the court to grant an order of perpetual injunction, restraining CB from enforcing the regulation which requires financial institutions to request customers’ social media handles as part of normal bank customer due diligence requirements.

The CBN in its response to the suit, filed a notice of preliminary objection, challenging the competence of the suit. The apex bank also disagreed that the said regulation constitutes any interference with the private life of the applicant, as claimed.

The judgment came as Justice Dimgba dismissed a suit, stating that the notice of preliminary objection held merit and consequently struck out the case.

During the proceedings, Justice Dimgba emphasised that providing a social media handle is akin to furnishing email addresses, phone numbers, and other contact details for banking purposes.

He argued that such information aids in conducting due diligence to ascertain if an individual is suitable for conducting business with a bank.

Justice Dimgba further explained that the essence of having a social media account implies a willingness to engage in public communication, thus rendering privacy concerns unfounded.

According to him, “First, the Applicant claims that the requirements on the CBN Regulations for financial institutions to request and collect the social media handle of its customers as part of KYC infringes on his right to privacy.”

“This claim is very ambitious and amounts to a very far throw.  The said Regulations are directed to and apply to financial institutions. It does not apply to private individuals such as the Applicant.

“Even if, as appears to be argued, that the Regulations itself would inevitably affect the Applicant, this claim is speculative for the simple reason that in nowhere in the affidavit in support was it stated that the Applicant operates an account with a financial institution and that the said institution had demanded his social media handle.  So the suggestion that he would be affected by this Regulation, albeit negatively, is very speculative and at large.

“Secondly, there is also no deposition to the effect that any financial institution had begun to implement this Regulation and that its implementation had begun to create disruptions and inconvenience against the general population, in which case one could infer that the suit should be legitimated as a public interest litigation.

“Thirdly, assuming even that the banks had begun to implement these regulations, the applicant assuming he maintained any bank accounts or sought to open one, but is being hindered or irritated by the requirement of the Regulation to avail his social media handle as part of KYC, the Applicant still had a choice, which is to refuse to do business with any bank insisting on the information as part of its social media handle, but to seek other alternatives.

“Fourthly, and for all it is worth, I do not see how asking a banking or potential banking customer to provide his social media handle can ever amount to a breach of privacy.

“Granted that Section 37 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended) provides inter alia: The privacy of citizens, their homes, correspondence, telephone conversations and telegraphic communications is hereby guaranteed and protected.

“My view is that the provision of a social media handle is of the same genre as the provision of email address, phone numbers and other means by which a potential customer of a bank can be contacted.

“Thus, it is clear from the face of the Regulations as set out above that email addresses, phone numbers and social media handles are all provided for under clause 6iv just to show that the aim was not to pry on anyone but rather to provide alternative ways by which a customer of the bank can be contacted, and or due diligence conducted on the person to determine if the person is a fit and proper person to extend banking services to.

“I do not see how this infringes on the right to privacy. I should even say that the essence of having a social media account was for one to be publicly visible communication-wise.  It, therefore, appears quite ironic, though wryly, that one can suggest that asking for information about a social media handle with which the individual exposes and immerses himself or herself in the public, can amount to a violation of privacy rights, which rights itself is all about isolation of one from public glare.

“It is also to my knowledge that even in filling some business applications,  personal information of this sort, is sometimes requested, and parties generally oblige. If it does not constitute a breach of privacy, why should it now?

“A social media handle is left at large for the world to see, being in the public space, everyone enjoys the liberty to have access to it whether or not consent was obtained. It would be highly unreasonable to hold the Respondent in breach of privacy for what other persons have access to.

“The apprehension of the Applicant of his social interactions being monitored is manifestly speculative in itself and rather incredulous to believe that the financial institutions have the luxury of time to concern itself with such frivolities.

“On the whole, if I did not sustain the NPO, I would have dismissed the suit for the reasons stated. But the NPO having been sustained, the suit is therefore hereby struck out.”

Continue Reading

Top Story

N1.3trn power debt: Tinubu approves payment, unveils plan to liquidate gas debts

Published

on

President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has given approval for the payment of N1.3trn legacy debts owed power generation companies.

Minister of Power, Chief Adebayo Adelabu speaking at the 8th Africa Energy Market Place 2024 in Abuja said that President Bola Tinubu has approved a plan to liquidate the debts.

According to him, “Mr. President has approved the submission made by the Minister of State Petroleum (Gas) to defray the outstanding debts owed to the gas supply companies to power generation companies. The payments are in two parts, the legacy debts and the current debts. For the current debt, approval has been given to pay about N130 billion from the gas stabilisation fund which the Federal Ministry of Finance will pay.”

“The payment of the legacy debt will be made from future royalties in exchange for incomes in the gas subsector which is quite satisfactory to the gas suppliers. This will allow the companies to enter into firm contracts with power generation companies.

“For the power generation companies, the debt is about N1.3 trillion and I can also tell you that we have the consent of the President to pay, on the condition that the actual figures are reconciled between the government and the companies. This we have successfully done and it is being signed off by both parties now. Majority has signed off and we are engaging to ensure that we have 100 percent sign off.

“The debt will be paid in two ways, immediate cash injection and through a guaranteed debt instrument, preferably a promissory note. This assures the companies that in the next three to five years, the government is ready to defray these debts.”

The Minister further stated that the government was working to get the distribution companies solvent and effective by unbundling their operations along state boundaries.

He insisted that the areas covered by the current DisCos were too large for them to deliver effective services to consumers.

In the same vein, the Chairman of the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC), Engr. Sanusi Garba lamented the poor financial state of the DisCos, noting that it is difficult for them to raise the needed capital to invest.

Engr. Garba pointed out that the challenges facing the sector were a culmination of all past inactions and missteps by those saddled with the responsibilities of managing the sector both at policy and operational levels.

According to him, “Today when you look at distribution companies they are clearly and technically insolvent, and you also want them to raise capital in terms of debt or equity. It’s a Herculean task. I also want to mention that implementing the power sector reform requires very strong political will to implement decisions that impact on the wider public.”

However, the African Development Bank (AfDB) disclosed that it has so far spent over $450 million to support various power sector projects and programmes with another $1 billion planned to support the power sector reform effort by the government.

Continue Reading

Top Story

Emirates Airline to resume Lagos-Dubai flights October 1

Published

on

Emirates Airline has disclosed that it will resume services to Nigeria from October 1, 2024, operating a daily service between Lagos and Dubai.

This development was announced in a statement on Thursday by the airline, which has its hub in the United Arab Emirates (UAE).

The airline disclosed that flight services will be operated using a Boeing 777-300ER.

“We are excited to resume our services to Nigeria. The Lagos-Dubai service has traditionally been popular with customers in Nigeria and we hope to reconnect leisure and business travellers to Dubai and onwards to our network of over 140 destinations.

“We thank the Nigerian government for their partnership and support in re-establishing this route and we look forward to welcoming passengers back onboard,” Emirates’ Deputy President and Chief Commercial Officer, Adnan Kazim, said.

Recall that Emirates Airlines had suspended its Dubai-Lagos flights in 2022 over its inability to repatriate trapped funds in Nigeria in the heat of the diplomatic row between the two countries.

This comes after Festus Keyamo, Minister Of Aviation And Aerospace Development in a post on his X (formerly Twitter) page had disclosed that he got correspondence from Emirates Airline when he visited Salem Saeed Al-Shamsi, ambassador of the United Arab Emirates (UAE) in Abuja.

 ”Yesterday, I paid a working visit to the Ambassador of the UAE to Nigeria, His Excellency, Salem Saeed Al-Shamsi at the UAE Embassy in Abuja. He handed me a correspondence from the Emirates Airline indicating a definite date for their resumption of flights to Nigeria,” Keyamo said.

Continue Reading

Trending