After COVID-19, why are we still losing lives to Cholera? 

4 Jun 2026

The resurgence of cholera in Borno State, which has already claimed dozens of lives and infected thousands within a matter of weeks, should serve as a stark reminder of the persistent vulnerabilities that continue to undermine public health in Nigeria. While authorities have moved to contain the outbreak through treatment centres, emergency interventions and public awareness campaigns, the scale and speed of the spread expose deeper structural deficiencies that demand urgent and sustained attention.

Recent figures indicating more than 4,200 suspected cases and at least 39 deaths paint a troubling picture. Particularly alarming is the report that hundreds of new infections were recorded within a single day. Such statistics are not merely numbers on official dashboards. They represent families plunged into grief, livelihoods disrupted and communities forced to confront a preventable disease that has become an all too familiar visitor in many parts of the country.

The question practically asks itself. After COVID-19 tested healthcare systems, governments and communities across the world, why are Nigerians still losing their lives to cholera? The pandemic was expected to leave behind stronger surveillance systems, greater public awareness of disease prevention and a renewed commitment to public health infrastructure. Yet the recurrence of large-scale cholera outbreaks suggests that many of those lessons remain insufficiently applied where they are needed most.

Cholera remains one of the clearest indicators of inadequate access to clean water, poor sanitation infrastructure and weak waste management systems. The disease thrives where these conditions persist, spreading rapidly through contaminated water sources and overcrowded settlements. Borno’s circumstances make the challenge especially severe. Years of insurgency have displaced millions of residents, strained public services and created conditions in which disease outbreaks can quickly escalate into humanitarian emergencies.

The state government deserves recognition for activating emergency response mechanisms and expanding treatment facilities. Healthcare workers, many of whom operate under difficult and often dangerous conditions, also merit commendation for their efforts to save lives. Yet experience has repeatedly shown that emergency responses alone cannot break the cycle of recurring outbreaks. Once media attention fades and infection rates decline, the underlying conditions that allowed the disease to flourish frequently remain unaddressed.

Nigeria has faced numerous cholera outbreaks over the years. Each episode has generated official concern, emergency funding and public appeals, yet the country continues to witness recurring infections that disproportionately affect vulnerable populations. This pattern raises important questions about the effectiveness of long-term planning and the implementation of preventive measures. It is difficult to justify a situation where a disease that is both preventable and treatable continues to exact such a heavy toll on citizens.

The outbreak also arrives at a time when public health systems are contending with multiple pressures. Disease surveillance efforts have been heightened in response to global concerns over infectious diseases, while healthcare facilities across many states continue to grapple with resource constraints. The rapid spread of cholera in Borno therefore underscores the need for stronger preparedness frameworks capable of detecting and containing outbreaks before they reach crisis levels.

Federal authorities must treat this situation as a matter of national importance. Cholera does not respect state boundaries, and outbreaks can quickly spread beyond their point of origin if decisive action is delayed. The Federal Ministry of Health, the Nigeria Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, development partners and humanitarian organisations must intensify collaboration with Borno State to ensure that treatment, surveillance and public education efforts are adequately supported.

Beyond the immediate response, governments at all levels must confront the longstanding issues that continue to fuel outbreaks. Access to potable water remains inadequate in many communities. Sanitation facilities are either absent or poorly maintained, while waste disposal systems are frequently overwhelmed. Investments in these areas may not generate the political visibility associated with large infrastructure projects, yet they are fundamental to public health, economic productivity and human dignity.

Public education is equally important. Communities must be equipped with accurate information regarding hygiene practices, water treatment and early symptoms of infection. Such awareness campaigns should be continuous rather than activated only during emergencies. Prevention remains far less costly, both financially and socially, than responding to a full-scale outbreak.

The Borno cholera crisis should therefore be viewed as more than a regional health challenge. It is a reflection of broader national shortcomings that require sustained commitment and accountability. Every outbreak carries lessons, and the most important lesson in this instance is that preventable diseases continue to flourish where essential services remain inadequate.

Lives are being lost to a disease that modern public health knowledge has long understood how to prevent and control. That reality should trouble policymakers far beyond Borno’s borders. The current emergency must be contained with urgency, but the larger objective should be to ensure that future generations are no longer forced to endure the same cycle of infection, suffering and loss.