Connect with us

Editorial

Academic Unions’ Strike: Agreement must be comprehensive for all sides

Published

on

Over six months of staying home, mammoth Nigerian tertiary institutions students whose academic calendar were brought to halt by lingering Academic unions’ strike, still lie expectant of what situation will tell in the coming week. While grievances and outcries awash the Nigerian public space over the lingering strike, negotiations between aggrieved Tertiary Institutions Unions and the Federal Government on Thursday, 18th August, 2022 was still shrouded with some clouds of grievances. Although the Federal Government claimed that other striking Unions including the Senior Staff Association of Nigerian Universities, (SANNU), Non-Academic Staff Union of Education and Associated Institutions, (NASU) and the National Association of Academic Technologists (NAAT) have accepted to resume work in the next one week, yet a major arrow head in the strike action, the Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) has refused to give any of such assurance over issues believed to be contentious and unsatisfactory to it.

The Federal Government had claimed that while other issues have been resolved, ASUU has refused to accept the offer to resume based on demands that its members should be paid the six months salary withheld by the Federal Government over the period the strike has lasted.  The Federal Government on Thursday, 18th August, 2022 insisted that it will not yield to the demand by ASUU for their members to be paid the six months salaries withheld over the ongoing strike, saying it is meant to be the penalty for their action. The Minister of Education, Adamu Adamu, at the 47th session of the State House Ministerial Media Briefing organised by the Presidential Communications Team at the Aso Rock Villa, Abuja, said not paying the backlog will serve as deterrence for others who may contemplate strike in future. He said that other three university based unions that are on strike have accepted to call off the strike in the next one week, except ASUU that has remained adamant insisting that its members should be paid the five months that their salary was stopped.

“All contentious issues between the government and ASUU had been settled except the quest for members’ salaries for the period of strike to be paid, a demand that Buhari has flatly rejected,” Adamu was quoted.

Adamu argued that ASUU went on strike despite the huge investment of trillions of naira the President Buhari regime and agencies such as TETFUND and UBEC in education, hence would have to bear the consequences, mentioning that the demand for payment for the strike period was not tenable as President Muhammadu Buhari has flatly rejected same.

“If you think it is for the government other than what the government is doing in the university to stop strike, the standard government has taken now is not to pay the months in which no work was done. I think this is the only thing that is in the hands of government to ensure that there is penalty for some behaviour like this. So, I believe teachers will think twice before they join strike if they know that at the end they are not going to be paid and the Federal Government is not acting arbitrarily. Before, it was some magnanimity on its part, there is a law which says if there is no work, there will be no pay. I believe this will be a very strong element that will be determining from going on strike,” the Minister said.

Meanwhile, ASUU, on its part raised issues which though may be related to salaries, yet reflected more grievances than mere demands for payment of six months withheld salaries as loudly claimed by the Federal Government. The Union on Thursday, 18th August, 2022, explained that its meeting with the Prof. Nimi Briggs-led committee last Tuesday, 16th August, 2022, ended in deadlock because the committee presented “award of a Recommended Consolidated University Academic Salary Structure (CONUASS), prepared by the National Salaries, Incomes and Wages Commission” which was unsatisfactory to it. ASUU in a press statement, made available to newsman by its President, Prof. Emmanuel Osodeke, argued the ‘award salary’ was “against the principle of collective bargaining, based on the Wages Boards and Industrial Council’s Decree No 1 of 1973, the Trade Dispute Act (1976), ILO Conventions 49 (1948), 91(1950), 154 (1988) and recommendation 153 (1981), Udoji Commission Report of 1974, and Cookey Commission Report of 1981.”

The report, ASUU noted, “also provided a platform for resolving such important issues as special salaries and conditions of service of university staff, university funding, roles of Pro-Chancellors, Vice-Chancellors, and National Universities Commission (NUC). “A key outcome was a special salary scale for university staff known as University Salary Structure (USS).”

ASUU alleged the Federal Government was insincere in its approach to resolving the lingering crisis in the university academic system, demanding that “The Federal Government, through the Ministry of Education, return to the New Draft Agreement of the 2009 FGN/ASUU Renegotiation Committee, whose work spanned a total of five and half years as a demonstration of good faith.”

The union further argued that the “award” presented by the Nimi Briggs-led Team appeared in a manner of “take-it-or-leave-it on a sheet of paper,” noting that “no serious country in the world treats their scholars this way.” In the statement, tagged “Why ASUU Rejects Governments Award of Salary,” the union claimed that “Government imposed the ongoing strike action on ASUU and it has encouraged it to linger because of its provocative indifference. The Munzali Jibril-led renegotiation committee submitted the first Draft Agreement in May 2021 but government’s official response did not come until about one year later! Again, the “Award” presented by the Nimi Briggs-led Team came across in a manner of take-it-or-leave-it on a sheet of paper. No serious country in the world treats their scholars this way.

“Over the years, particularly since 1992, the Union has always argued for and negotiated a separate salary structure for academics for obvious reasons. ASUU does not accept any awarded salary as was the case in the administration of General Abdulsalam Abubakar. The separate salary structures in all FGN/ASUU Agreements were usually the outcome of collective bargaining processes. ‘Leaking economy’ The major reason given by the Federal Government for the miserly offer, paucity of revenue, is not tenable. This is because of several reasons chief of which is poor management of the economy. This has given rise to leakages in the revenue of governments at all levels. There is wasteful spending, misappropriation of fund and outright stealing of our collective patrimony.

“ASUU believes that if the leakages in the management of the country’s resources are stopped, there will be more than enough to meet the nation’s revenue and expenditure targets without borrowing and plunging the country into a debt crisis as is the case now,” it argued. ASUU noted that “at the commencement of the renegotiation of the 2009 FGN/ASUU Agreement on 16th March 2017, both the Federal Government and ASUU Teams agreed to be guided by” some terms of reference, but the Federal Government reneged on its side to abide by the agreement.

It warned that, “Government’s surreptitious move to set aside the principle of collective bargaining, which is globally in practice, has the potential of damaging lecturers’ psyche and destroying commitment to the university system.

“This is, no doubt, injurious to Nigeria’s aspiration to become an active player in the global knowledge industry,” ASUU argued.

Recall that ASUU had since February 14, 2022, embarked on an indefinite strike over unresolved differences with the government. The union had accused the government of failing to honour and implement the Memorandum of Understanding and Memorandum of Action signed between both parties in 2020 – an agreement that was reached to end a nine-month old strike by ASUU in 2020.

Other issues of contention include the government’s poor commitment to the payment of academic earned allowances and the continued use of the Integrated Personnel Payroll Information System (IPPIS). Also, is the grievances of the academic stakeholders over the refusal of the government to adopt the Universities Transparency and Accountability Solution, as it’s recommended substitution for  IPPIS, and the proliferation of universities in the country. Grievances by other stakeholders in the nation’s public tertiary institutions system had seen more Unions including NAAT, SSANU and NASU, subsequently joining up in the strike.

The grounds that informed the strike is known to have been clustered with more controversies over contentious issues that have so far stalled  agreement between the contending parties. While the Federal Government has claimed other issues of contention have been addressed, except demands for payment of the six months salaries withheld for the period the strike has lingered so far, it is apparent ASUU’s demands transcend such claim. Although, the Minister of Education had informed that the University Perculiar Personnel and Payroll System (U3PS) and the University Transparency Accountability Solution (UTAS) outscored the Integrated Personnel Payroll and Information System (IPPIS) during the integrity tests conducted by the National Information Technology Development Agency (NITDA), affirming that ASUU’s peculiarities will be accommodated in whatever platform that may be adopted, and that currently, the IPPIS has been made to accommodate the issue of sabbatical for lecturers, yet there is more to having a lasting solution to the grievances of the aggrieved parties, most importantly ASUU in this case.

It is therefore, essential for the Government to reach a comprehensive agreement with ASUU accommodating other Unions, within an elaborate scope of systemic architecture not just to get them to work, but for lasting solution to the issues of contest which over the years have formed the bases of unending strikes. The crash dispositions to agreements over time by successive governments have only left the phenomenon of ceaseless strikes which has characterised the tertiary institutions system in the Country with gross academic instability, breaking down the fabrics of excellence demanded of such institutions. The Federal Government should, with this particular case, begin a paradigm shift by making its agreement with the Unions a comprehensive whole, not leaving any side untouched, a deficiency which may constitute the ground for future strike.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Editorial

Endless turnaround maintenance of Port Harcourt Refinery

Published

on

Since 2021 when the turnaround maintenance of the Port Harcourt Refinery started, there have been heaps of failed promises of the production commencement date.

First, it was former Minister of State for Petroleum, Timipre Sylva promising severally of commencement of productions of Port Harcourt Refinery, but these promises never came to limelight till he resigned for political calling.

Next was the Managing Director of Port Harcourt Refinery, Ahmed Dikko who at a time said the turnaround maintenance was 98 percent completed and would have commenced operations in December 2023. That promise again was unfulfilled.

The Group Managing Director of Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPC Ltd), Mele Kyari equally said that Port Harcourt Refinery would start production in two weeks time, that elapsed in April, 2024. April has come and gone.

The Head, Corporate Communications of NNPC Ltd, Olufemi Soneye was also quoted to have said that the reason for non-commencement of operations of the Port Harcourt Refinery was regulatory and compliance tests. As it seems, all efforts to restart the operations of the Port Harcourt Refinery and by extension other refineries, have been futile.

Political watchers have adduced poor management, corruption, sabotage and lack of political will as some of the problems confronting smooth operations of our refineries. They particularly accused those benefitting from importation of petroleum products as being responsible for the non-functionality of the four refineries in Nigeria.

Political will, of course, plays a major role in shaping directions the policies go. Political will in this instance translates to good leadership, and in this case, the buck stops at the table of the Federal Government, particularly the President, who doubles as the Minister of Petroleum.

Petroleum being the mainstay of the country’s economy should be given all the attention it deserves. The reason being that virtually everything in the country is tied to the petroleum products situation.

Since the announcement of the removal of fuel subsidy on May 29th, 2023 by President Tinubu on assumption of office, life has not been the same in Nigeria. Cost of living has  risen astronomically, consequent upon the hike in price of petroleum products.

In the midst of plenty, courtesy of the abundant human and material resources, Nigeria is still often described as the poverty capital of the world. What an irony! Turnaround maintenance of the refineries subsists without end. Every hope is now placed on the Dangote Refinery, a private outfit. While the diesel price slash is commendable, how on earth will a single private entity take the whole country to Eldorado?

We cannot regulate what we do not produce, this is a natural principle that cannot be contravened. We only pray that Port Harcourt Refinery comes on stream someday.

We look forward to that time. Our position is that Government agencies saddled with the responsibility of providing fuel and other petroleum products to Nigeria must do their work and justify their pay.

This onerous task is mandatory and statutory to them and shall amount to disservice if they fail. Our prayer is not for them to fail, but that they fulfil their vows and make the country great for the overall interest of all.

Tecnimont, the Italian company undertaking the $1.5 billion rehabilitation project of the Port Harcourt Refinery has through its Local Managing Director, Gian Fabio Del Cioppo pledged to fulfil the terms of contract, so as far as we are concerned, there is nothing stopping the country from achieving the target of the turnaround maintenance project.

The only clog would of course be lack of political will, which we know could be cultivated. So let all hands be put on deck to achieve results.

Continue Reading

Editorial

Gas explosions: Nigeria and its avoidable tragedies 

Published

on

Nigerians die daily for reasons  so avoidable it would make  a 19th century peasant weep.  The deaths are often a product of systemic wickedness, nonchalance, and greed. Too often have gas explosions claimed the lives of Nigerians untimely. Whether it is the leaders refusing to enforce the checks and balances for personal gain, or citizens selling defective gas cylinders, it all balls down to a collective aversion for kindness.

The internet is rife with news of this tragedy occurring in a Sisyphean cycle. Jolted by the cries of the populace, the leaders promise reprieve, release press statements and in the weeks that follow, little to nothing happens. “One must imagine Sisyphus happy,” Camus wrote. Unfortunately, our Nigerian dead imagine nothing.

While people relaxed from their labour, were preparing for the Workers Day celebrations, nine people including a pregnant woman were injured in Tuesday’s gas cylinder explosion at Alaba Lane, Alayabiagba Community of Ajegunle-Apapa, Lagos.

“The fire explosion started around 1:30 pm and immediately, two tricycles were burnt, school children coming back from school were affected. A particular young man was seriously affected as his body was peeling off, but rushed to the Gbagada General Hospital,” according to reports.

The usual suspect is, of course, negligence, as the Director of Lagos State Fire and Rescue Service, Margaret Adeseye, puts it: “preliminary investigation revealed that several various gas cylinders traded within the neighbourhood have one triggered from a susceptible leakage leading to the snapping of a high tension cable and resultant Fire.”

The explosion razed down “four commercial tricycles, six lock-up shops, a bungalow part of properties, while salvaging adjoining structures including a major fuel service station.” Children were hurt, the future of the nation plunged, as usual into avoidable misfortune.

The way out is through. The press releases are wonderful PR statements but they do not bring back the dead, as was the case in Ogun State recently where a truck explosion cost the nation another life. The leaders must enforce the checks and balances put in place. The law is no decoration.

We mustn’t wait until a politician’s family member is involved in a tragic gas accident before “banning” (as is the default response of the Nigerian leadership). The leaders must realise that such misfortunes are contagious, and money is hardly a bulwark against 3rd degree burns in a nation where all its doctors are fleeing.

Renewed Hope requires renewed action. This is all that Nigerians ask of its leaders. All agencies responsible for monitoring trucks, cylinders need to work together to defeat this peculiar evil. Like COVID-19, gas explosions are no respecter of persons.

Of course, citizens too must do their part and resist the allure of profit over the death of others. A society without empathy is headed for a dystopia. It will not matter the price of petrol or electricity tariff, if all that matters is the pursuit of super profit at the expense of one’s neighbour. We owe it to the dead to live fully and graciously. To escape, as we should, avoidable tragedies.

Continue Reading

Editorial

Dangote’s diesel price slash proactive step towards economic growth

Published

on

Oil marketers have continued to dispense Automotive Gas Oil, popularly called diesel, at a price between N1,350/litre and N1,450/litre in various locations across the country despite repeated cuts in the price of the commodity by the Dangote Petroleum Refinery. Although they attributed the high pump price of AGO to transportation costs, taxes and old stock in most of the tanks in their filling stations, they commended Dangote for yielding to their calls for further reduction in the price of AGO from the plant.

The recent reduction in the price of diesel to N940 per litre by Dangote Refinery is a welcome development. It will, hopefully, help reduce the cost of transportation, which will presumably, lead to a reduction in the prices of goods and services. This is good news for consumers who have been grappling with high inflation and weak purchasing power.

The price change of N940 applies to customers buying five million litres and above from the refinery, while N970 is for customers buying one million litres and above. It would be recalled that the management of Dangote Petroleum Refinery announced a further reduction of the price of diesel from 1200 to 1,000 Naira per litre barely two weeks ago.

The strategic impact of affordable diesel prices on the economy cannot be overstated, especially in a country like Nigeria where transportation, a key component of any business activity, is controlled by the private sector. Diesel is the fuel that powers most commercial vehicles, including trucks, buses, and generators, which are essential for the movement of people, goods and services across the country.

If diesel prices are high, it directly affects the cost of transportation, which in turn affects the prices of goods and services. For example, if a trader has to pay more for transportation, they will pass on the cost to the end consumer, resulting in higher prices for basic commodities like food, clothing, and household items.

This marks the third major reduction in diesel price in less than three weeks when the product was sold at N1,700 to N1,200 and also a further reduction to N1,000 and now N940 for diesel and N980 for aviation fuel per litre.

The decision of Dangote Refinery to first crash the price from about N1,750/litre to N1,200/litre, N1,000/litre and now N940 is an eloquent demonstration of the capacity of local industries to impact the fortunes of the national economy positively. The trickle-down effect of this singular intervention promises to change the dynamics in the energy cost equation of the country, amid the inadequate and rising cost of electricity.

The reduction will have far-reaching effects in critical sectors like industrial operations, transportation, logistics, and agriculture, contributing to easing the high inflation rate in the country. It must be noted that most manufacturing companies in Nigeria generate their own electricity powered by diesel. If the price of that energy source is affordable, a lot of companies will be back in operation with the added advantage of enhanced employment opportunities and a friendlier cost of products.

Before now, manufacturers were confronted with abnormal costs of doing business instigated by the energy crisis. What followed was a steep rise in prices of factors of production as well as other inputs that impacted negatively in the economy. As a result, many foreign companies had to leave the country due to the high cost of doing business. This and the worsening power supply had and is still having very devastating effects on businesses at the moment.

Nigeria’s annual inflation rate has surged to 33.2 percent, the highest since March 1996, up from 31.7 percent in the previous month. This sharp increase in inflation is primarily driven by the steep depreciation of the local currency and the removal of fuel subsidies. Food inflation, which constitutes a significant portion of Nigeria’s inflation basket, has continued to climb, reaching 40 per cent in March, the highest level since August 2005. Additionally, the annual core inflation rate, excluding farm produce and energy, has soared to a multi-year high of 25.9 per cent in March. Consumer prices, however, eased slightly to three per cent, down from 3.1 percent as of February 1.

The benefits of affordable diesel prices extend beyond the consumer level. It also has a positive impact on the nation’s economy as a whole. For one, it will help reduce the cost of production for manufacturers and other businesses that rely on diesel-powered machinery. This will make them more competitive and ultimately lead to increased economic growth.

Furthermore, affordable diesel prices will also make it easier for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to thrive. SMEs are the backbone of any economy, and reducing their operational costs will help them grow and create jobs which, in turn, will boost the economy.

Ultimately, the artificial fuel queues resumption is uncalled for at this critical time of untold hardship on Nigerians. Since the planned removal of the fuel subsidy has failed, the best thing for the APC-led administration is to carry out an urgent review of the policy. Nigerians have witnessed untold hardship in the past few days due to the scarcity of petroleum products in the country.

Few filling stations selling fuel are doing so at cutthroat prices. If you are lucky enough to get commercial transportation, you should be ready to pay more than you already budgeted. This situation has shown that the said fuel subsidy removal by the Tinubu-led administration is a failure, a professional scam and there is a need for an urgent review of the policy.

We urge the Federal to deploy emergency means of resolving the unbearable fuel scarcity situation because Nigerians are passing through hell.

Continue Reading

Trending