Connect with us

Top Story

10th NASS Leadership: Akpabio ignores APC NWC, names Senate Committee Chairmen

Published

on

…As VP Shettima meets behind closed-doors with Abass, others

By Moses Adeniyi

Despite the decision of the All Progressives Congress National Working Council to come up with a unanimous decision on the composition of the 10th Nigerian National Assembly composition, in a daring move, the President of the Senate, Senator Godswill Akpabio has announced Chairmen for Special Committees in the 10th Senate.

In line with the Standing Orders 2022 as amended,  the Senate President named members into the Selection Committee on Tuesday.

The composition as he declared, has him as the Chairman with the Deputy Senate President, Senator  Jibrin Barau as the Vice chairman and other principal officers of both majority and minority extraction.

Members of the Selection Committee are Senator Opeyemi  Bamidele (APC, Ekiti  Central), the Senate  Majority leader; Senator  Ali Ndume (APC, Borno), the Senate  Chief Whip; Senator  Dave Umahi (APC, Ebonyi  South), the Deputy Leader and Senator  Lola Ashiru (APC, Kwara South), the Deputy  Whip.

Other members are Senator Simon Davou Mwadkwon (PDP, Plateau North), the Senate-Minority Leader; Senator Darlington Nwokocha (LP, Abia Central), the  Minority Whip; Senator Oyewumi Kamorudeen Olarere, (PDP Osun West), the Deputy Minority Leader and Senator Rufai Hanga (NNPP, Kano Central), the Deputy Minority Whip.

Akpabio also named the Chairmen and Deputy Chairmen of the other Special Committees of the Senate. Among the Chairmen are Senator Tutus Zam, APC, Benue North West; Senator Sunday Karimi, APC, Kogi West; Senator  Okechukwu Ezea, LP, Enugu East; Senator Aliyu Ahmed Wadada, SDP,  Nasarawa West, and Senator Shehu Umar, APC, Bauchi South.

Also named were Senator   Garba  Maidoki, PDP, Kebbi South; Senator Adeyemi Adaramodu, APC, Ekiti South and Senator Olamilekan Adeola, APC, Ogun West.

According to the portfolio, Senator Titus Zam was named as the Chairman Senate Committee on Rules and Business with Senator Opeyemi Bamidele as vice chairman, while Senator Sunday Karimi was appointed Chairman, Committee on Senate Services with Senator Williams Jonah as vice Chairman.

Others are Senate Committee on Ethics, Privileges and Public Petitions with Senator Okechukwu Ezea as Chairman and Khalid Mustapha as Vice Chairman.

Senator Ahmed Wadada was named as Chairman of the Senate Committee on Public Accounts and Senator Onyeka Peter Nwebonyi as Vice Chairman.

Committee on National Security and Intelligence has Senator Shehu Umar as Chairman with Senator Asuquo Ekpenyong as Vice Chairman.

In addition, the Senate Committee on Legislative Compliance has Senator Garba Musa Maidoki as Chairman and Senator Ede Dafinone as Vice Chairman.

The Senate Committee on Media and Public Affairs has Senator Adaramodu Adeyemi Raphael as Chairman and Senator Salisu Shuaibu Afolabi as Vice Chairman.

Akpabio added that in accordance with Senate Standing Orders 95(b) as amended, under sundry matters and in anticipation of the possibility of receiving the Supplementary Appropriation Bill, the Selection Committee has also resolved to set up a committee on Appropriations.

He named Senator Solomon Adeola as the Chairman of the Senate Committee on Appropriations and Senator Ali Ndume as Vice Chairman.

The development, however, NewsDirect gathered further angered the leadership of political parties, particularly of the ruling APC which had earlier expressed discontentment over the selection of principal officers earlier announced last week by President of the Senate, Godswill Akpabio and Speaker of the House of  Representatives, Tajudeen Abbas.

Recall that last week, speaking after his selection as announced by Akpabio, the Senate leader, Opeyemi Bamidele, had said his emergence was not a matter to be determined by the political party but a resolution of members of six minority parties in the National Assembly.

Addressing journalists in Abuja, Senator Bamidele had said the Senate would constitute special and standing committees before the end of the month.

He had said, “For us, the next task is to ensure we hit the ground running so that we are able to take steps to show that we have a clear understanding of what is to be done.

“The first task ahead of us is to constitute special committees of the 10th Senate. Our rules make provision for six special committees.

“This is so that every senator can get busy, based on their own professional background and can properly fit into the sector where they can add value.

“We are ready to attend to correspondence from the executive. Through the Committee of the Whole of the House, we will commence with the confirmation hearing of service chiefs and some other appointees who had been named by the President.

“By the grace of God, we will be able to make a difference that will be positive, that will be worth the effort of all of you that worked with us in ensuring that the two presiding officers emerged in a manner that was not rancorous. But, of course, the emergence of the remaining principal officers of the 10th Senate was not an issue that was meant to be decided on the floor.

“Rather, it was an issue which on the one hand as related to the All Progressives Part, (APC), needed to be decided among the critical stakeholders of the party. This was what led to the emergence of the officers.

“On the other hand, with respect to the minority parties, again it wasn’t entirely a party affair because it wasn’t a typical situation where you have one opposition party but rather six political parties were involved.

“Fifty of our colleagues were involved. So rather than it being a decision to be taken at the secretariat of political parties, it was more of a decision taken by members who were elected on the platform of the six minority parties.

“Thirty-eight of them by virtue of their signature took a decision as to who their leaders will be and, of course, this was also communicated to their respective political parties and as democrats, all the presiding officers did was to follow suit because more than a single majority had decided.”

Meanwhile, as discontentment grows regarding the composition of the leadership of the 10th NASS,  the Vice President Kashim Shettima met behind closed doors with principal officers of the National Assembly, led by the Speaker, Hon. Abass, at the Presidential Villa, Abuja on Tuesday.

Also, present at the closed-door meeting were ranking members of the House of Representatives, including the Deputy Speaker, Hon. Benjamin Kalu.

The meeting constituted the first the leadership of the House had with the number two citizen, since their emergence as Speaker and Deputy Speaker respectively.

Recall that the announcement of principal officers of both chambers of the NASS as endorsed by Akpabio and Abbas had last week generated controversies as the Senator Abdullahi Adamu-led National Working Committee (NWC) of the All Progressives Congress (APC) had distanced itself from the selection, a development that showed both sides were now in tussle.

Both Akpabio and Abbas are products of consensus candidates of the ruling party, but their choice of other principal officers of the chambers appeared to have defied the endorsement of the party leadership.

Last week, the Senate President and the Speaker had, after a closed-door meeting with members, came up with other principal officers by consensus for the two chambers respectively.

While Akpabio picked Opeyemi Bamidele, Dave Umahi, Ali Ndume and Lola Ashiru as Majority Leader, Deputy Majority Leader, Chief Whip and Deputy Chief Whip in the Senate respectively, Abbas announced Julius Ihonvbere and Kingsley Chinda as Majority Leader and Minority Leader respectively in the House of Representatives.

The selection both represented the APC and the opposition Peoples Democratic Party (PDP).

The PDP, Labour Party (LP) and New Nigerian Peoples Party (NNPP) shared other minority positions in the House of Representatives.

Discontented with the development, the Senator Abdullahi Adamu-led NWC of the APC, immediately disowned the leadership positions announced by Akpabio and Abbas.

The party leadership held that the party had not officially communicated with both presiding officers, distancing itself from the selection.

The National Chairman of APC, Adamu disowned the leadership of the National Assembly, as governors elected on the platform of the party pledged their loyalty to the party leadership.

Adamu at a meeting with the Progressive Governors’ Forum (PGF), led by Senator Hope Uzodinma of Imo State, which had members of the NWC in attendance in Abuja last week, said it is the party’s responsibility to communicate such decisions to the Assembly leadership, saying the NWC under him will not break away from the tradition.

“The essence of today’s invitation is simply to rub minds with you as a matter of courtesy. You will get an update on the National Assembly, sharing of powers, particularly the leadership of the chambers.

“The election of the Senate President and Deputy Senate President, the election of the Speaker and the Deputy Speaker of the House of Representatives have been determined and they have now assumed their responsibilities.

“The remaining offices at the two chambers is yet to be done. I had a courtesy call on Saturday from the President of the Senate and his deputy. The following day which was Sunday, I received a visit from the Speaker and his deputy coming to me for Sallah’s homage.

“But I am just hearing rumours now from the online media that there have been some announcements in the Senate and House of Representatives. The national headquarters of the party or the NWC has not given any such information or communicated about the choice of the remaining offices and until we formally resolve and communicate to them in writing which is the normal practice as had been done before we came here, it is not our intention to break away from tradition.

“So, whatever announcement is done either by the President of the Senate, Deputy Senate President, Speaker or Deputy Speaker, is not from this secretariat.

“We are going to formally inform you that we are going to have a caucus. For quite some time, there has been no caucus in place. The caucus has been reconstituted according to the constitution of APC and we will be discussing that with you.

“As Governors, you know your States more than we know it. Even if we come from the same State, the leadership is with you as governors. We will hear your advice and then see how we can ensure that we are in complete compliance with the provisions of the constitution of the party.

“We hope we will be receiving some reports from the Progressive Governors Forum chairman or his representative, to get to know your thinking, your feelings on what to do to improve the chances of the party and, therefore, reduce the problems and bickerings we have been hearing from time to time.

“Along with the caucus, the National Advisory Council, we will give you the list that has been prepared and make sure every State is represented and we will give you the knowledge of it before the date so that if there is any advice, you will give us before the date.

“You will also be given the details of the audit of accounts from April 2022 to April 2023. The Presidential Campaign Council, PCC, the account has been audited and it has been submitted to the Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC, by the party,” Adamu had said.

In response at the meeting, Uzodimma who spoke on behalf of the governors had said, “We are loyal to the party completely, and we assure the leadership of the party that all the Governors here are constructive partners in the job of building our party and are willing to work with the party and submit to the ideas and norms of the party.

“We don’t have another party. This party is the largest party in black and white Africa, and we will have to run with it.”

On Adamu’s position on the principal officers of the NASS, Uzodinma said, “Chairman never said they are on their own. The National Assembly leadership belongs to our great party and they are members of our party and they enjoy our support.

“If there is any way there is a communication gap anywhere, we will make it up and we have our internal mechanism of resolving such things. The National Assembly leadership enjoys the support of the Progressive Governors’ Forum and that of our party. We don’t have any problem at all.”

Akpabio last week announced  Senator Opeyemi Bamidele (APC, Ekiti Central), as the Senate majority leader and former Senate Leader, Senator Ali Ndume (APC, Borno South), as the Senate Chief Whip.

Reading a letter from the APC, caucus, Akpabio also announced Senator Dave Umahi (APC, Ebonyi South), as the deputy leader and Senator Lola Ashiru (APC, Kwara South), as the deputy whip.

Akpabio had said, “The All Progressives Congress, APC, caucus of the Senate after consultations, has emerged with their leadership which will be the fulcrum of commencing other businesses of the chamber.”

He also announced Senator Simon Davou Mwadkwon (PDP, Plateau North), as the Senate Minority Leader and Senator Darlington Nwokocha (LP, Abia Central), as Minority Whip.

Akpabio also read the names of Senator Oyewumi Kamorudeen Olarere (PDP, Osun West), as Deputy Minority Leader and Senator Rufai Hanga (NNPP, Kano Central), as Deputy Minority Whip.

On his part, the Speaker, Tajudeen Abbas, last week announced Julius Ihonvbere, representing the Owan Federal Constituency of Edo State as the majority leader, and Kingsley Chinda, who represents Ohio/Akpor Federal Constituency of Rivers State as the minority leader.

Other principal officers from the majority caucus as announced by Abbas were Abdullahi Ibrahim Halims (Kogi, APC), the deputy majority leader; Usman Bello Kumo (Gombe, APC), chief whip and Adewumi Onanuga (Ogun, APC), deputy majority whip.

In addition, Kingsley Chinda was picked as minority leader; Ali Isa JC (Gombe, PDP) minority whip; Ali Madaki (Kano, NNPP) deputy minority leader; and George Ozodinobi (Anambra, LP) deputy minority whip.

Top Story

Lagos-Calabar Highway: Atiku faults FG’s demolition of properties

Published

on

..Accuses Tinubu of prioritising business over public good

…Says demolition of Landmark, others unfriendly to foreign Investors

…Says N1trn released without approval, accuses FG of financial recklessness

By Sodiq Adelakun

Former Vice President and Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) presidential candidate, Atiku Abubakar, has strongly condemned the demolition of properties in the Oniru corridor, including parts of Lagos State’s landmark, tourist, and recreational attractions, to make way for the Coastal Highway project.

Recall that Labour Party (LP) presidential candidate in the 2023 general election, Peter Obi, faulted the ongoing Lagos-Calabar Coastal Highway project, describing it as not necessary.

Obi had earlier condemned the commencement of the multi-trillion naira coastal highway project, when most internal roads in the country were impassable.

Meanwhile, Atiku criticised the lack of proper notification and the Tinubu-led government’s handling of the project, which he believes is a major hindrance to Nigeria’s ability to attract foreign direct investment.

In a statement issued on Sunday by his media adviser, Paul Ibe, Atiku alleged that President Bola Tinubu and Gilbert Chagoury, the owner of Hitech, the contractor handling the highway project, are the sole driving forces behind the rapid progress of the Coastal Highway project.

He claimed that the contract was awarded in violation of procurement regulations, raising concerns about transparency and accountability.

Furthermore, Atiku highlighted a clear conflict of interest, pointing out that President Tinubu’s son and associates hold positions on the boards of companies owned by Gilbert Chagoury.

The former Vice President noted that “Tinubu’s son, Seyi, is a director on the board of CDK Integrated Industries, a subsidiary of the Chagoury Group, which manufactures ceramic tiles and sanitary towels.

Part of the statement reads, “The former Vice President restated that it has become obvious even to the undiscerning that the Lagos-Calabar Coastal Highway is being done in a hurry purely because of the business relationship between Tinubu and Gilbert Chagoury, the owner of Hitech, the contractor that was awarded the contract for the highway project in contravention of the procurement laws. It is on record that this project is the most expensive single project ever embarked upon by the Nigerian government.

“The fact that it is happening at a time when Nigeria is facing its worst economic crisis ever is a red flag.

“To add insult to injury, this project that is being done for more than $13bn was awarded without competitive bidding. From all indications, the so-called Badagry-Sokoto highway would be awarded similarly at an enormous cost to taxpayers purely because Tinubu has put his interest ahead of the Nigerian people.”

Atiku said the demolition of tourist and recreational facilities and other properties within the Oniru corridor, including parts of Landmark, without ample notice, is one of the reasons foreign direct investments continue to elude the country.

He reiterated that “rather than improving the ease of doing business, the Tinubu administration had shown to the world that his personal business interest and that of his family would always be prioritised over and above national interest.”

Atiku noted that investors observe the treatment of local businesses and would avoid regions where their investments lack protection.

The former PDP presidential candidate stressed, “Tinubu has been globetrotting in search of foreign direct investments. He claims to have secured over $30 billion from various companies, but none has been forthcoming. Rather, all manufacturing firms have been posting heavy losses while some are exiting due to his poorly implemented exchange rate unification policy with even Aliko Dangote describing it as a huge mess at the recent annual general meeting of Dangote Sugar Refinery.

“The IMF in its latest report stated that Nigeria will by the end of the year become the 4th largest economy in Africa behind South Africa, Egypt and Algeria, a disgraceful development for a nation which was the largest in Africa by a mile when the PDP left the stage in 2015.

“Investors are seeing how local businesses are being treated and will not come to a place where their investments will not be protected. In saner climes, businesses such as Landmark would have been given at least two years’ notice for effective planning. But Tinubu’s eagerness to satisfy his business partners impaired his ability to coordinate the project properly.”

In the same vein, he criticised the Tinubu administration’s handling of the Lagos-Calabar coastal highway project, calling it a “rushed” and “reckless” endeavor.

Atiku noted that the environmental impact assessment report was not completed, and the right of way for the 700 km stretch of the project was not secured.

He also pointed out that the project was converted from a public-private partnership (PPP) to a government-funded project without proper approval, and that over N1 trillion was released without National Assembly approval, ignoring the initial N500 million approved by the legislature.

Continue Reading

Top Story

Corruption allegations: EFCC denies issuing list of ex-Govs under investigation

Published

on

By Adeyanju Esther

In response to a recent flurry of reports circulating in various media outlets, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) has come forward to disassociate itself from a purported list of ex-governors allegedly under investigation for corruption.

The commission has denied “any involvement in the dissemination of such information and asserts that no discussions regarding the investigation of ex-governors have taken place with any media entity.”

The report, titled ‘EFCC Releases Full List of 58 Ex-Governors that Embezzled N2.187 Trillion,’ has been deemed by the EFCC as false and misleading.

The Commission has clarified that it neither issued nor endorsed the aforementioned list, emphasising that it is a fabrication with motives known only to its authors.

“The EFCC urges the public to disregard the false report and warns the media against perpetuating inaccurate information that could mislead the public.

“Furthermore, the EFCC advises media organizations to exercise diligence in fact-checking and verifying information related to ongoing investigations by consulting directly with the commission to prevent the spread of false and misleading reports,” the Commission said.

Continue Reading

Top Story

N5.9trn, $4.6bn loans: SERAP sues Sani, Wike

Published

on

The Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has filed a lawsuit against Nigeria’s governors and the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, Mr Nyesom Wike “over their failure to account for N5.9 trillion and $4.6 billion loans obtained by their states and the FCT, and to publish copies of the loan agreements, including details and locations of projects executed with the loans.”

The suit followed the disclosure last month by Governor Uba Sani of Kaduna State that the immediate past administration of Nasir El-Rufai left $587m, N85bn debt and 115 contractual liabilities, making it impossible for the state to pay salaries.

In the suit number FHC/ABJ/CS/592/2024 filed last Friday at the Federal High Court, Abuja, SERAP is asking the court to “direct and compel the governors and Mr Wike to account for N5.9trn and $4.6bn loans obtained by their states and the FCT and to publish copies of the loan agreements, location of projects executed with the loans.”

SERAP is also asking the court to “direct and compel the governors and Mr Wike to invite the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission [EFCC] and the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission [ICPC] to investigate the spending of all the loans obtained to date by their states and the FCT.”

In the suit, SERAP is arguing that, “It is in the public interest to grant the reliefs sought. Nigerians have the right to see and scrutinise the loan agreements and know the details of how the domestic and external loans obtained by the governors and FCT minister are spent.”

According to SERAP, “Opacity in the spending of the loans obtained by the governors and Mr Wike would continue to have negative impacts on the fundamental interests of the citizens.”

SERAP is also arguing that, “Many states and the FCT are reportedly spending public funds which may include the loans obtained by them to fund unnecessary travels, buy exotic and bulletproof cars and generally fund the lavish lifestyles of politicians.”

SERAP is also arguing that, “Many states and the FCT are also allegedly mismanaging public funds which may include domestic and external loans obtained from bilateral and multilateral institutions and agencies.”

According to SERAP, “Many states and the FCT reportedly owe civil servants’ salaries and pensions. Several states are borrowing to pay salaries. Millions of Nigerians resident in the state and FCT continue to be denied access to basic public goods and services such as quality education and healthcare.”

According to SERAP, “Transparency in the spending of the loans obtained by the states and FCT is fundamental to increase accountability, prevent corruption, and build trust in democratic institutions with the ultimate aim of strengthening the rule of law.”

The suit filed on behalf of SERAP by its lawyers Kolawole Oluwadare, Kehinde Oyewumi and Ms Valentina Adegoke, read in part: “States and the FCT should be guided by transparency and accountability principles and proactively account for the loans obtained and publish copies of the loan agreements.

“Widely publishing copies of the loan agreements and spending details of the loans obtained would ensure that persons with public responsibilities are answerable to the people for the performance of their duties in the management of public funds.

“State governors and Mr Wike cannot hide under the excuse that the Freedom of Information Act is not applicable to their states and the FCT. The legal obligations to publish the information sought are also imposed by the provisions of the Nigerian Constitution and the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights.

“According to Nigeria’s Debt Management Office, the total public domestic debt portfolio for the country’s 36 states and the Federal Capital Territory is N5.9 trillion. The total public external debt portfolio is $4.6 billion.

“The domestic and external loans obtained by the states and the FCT are vulnerable to corruption and mismanagement. The states and FCT have a responsibility to ensure transparency and accountability in how any loans obtained by the states and FCT are spent, to reduce vulnerability to corruption and mismanagement.

“Directing and compelling the states and FCT to publish copies of the loan agreements would allow Nigerians to scrutinise them, and promote transparency and accountability on the spending of public funds including the loans obtained.

“Providing and widely publishing the details of the spending of the domestic and external loans obtained by the states and FCT would enable Nigerians to effectively and meaningfully engage in the management of the loans.

“The constitutional principle of democracy also provides a foundation for Nigerians’ right to know the details of loan agreements and how the loans obtained are spent. Citizens’ right to know promotes openness, transparency, and accountability that is in turn crucial for the country’s democratic order.

“The effective operation of representative democracy depends on the people being able to scrutinize, discuss and contribute to government decision making, including on the spending of loans obtained by the states and FCT.

“To do this, they need information to enable them to participate more effectively in the management of public funds by their state governments and the FCT.

“The public interest in obtaining information about expenditures relating to the loans obtained by the states and FCT outweighs any privacy or other interest.

“The oversight afforded by public access to such details would serve as an important check on the activities of the states and FCT and help to prevent abuses of the public trust.

“There is a significant risk of mismanagement or diversion of funds linked to loans obtained by state governments and the FCT. The accounts of Nigeria’s 36 states and the FCT are generally not open to public scrutiny.

“The Nigerian Constitution, human rights and anti corruption treaties to which Nigeria is a state party also impose obligations on the states and FCT to prevent mismanagement or diversion of public funds including the loans obtained.

“Many years of allegations of corruption and mismanagement of public funds including the loans obtained by the states and FCT have contributed to widespread poverty, underdevelopment and lack of access to public goods and services.”

No date has been fixed for the hearing of the suit.

Continue Reading

Trending